| Literature DB >> 32812166 |
Tímea Téglás1, Dóra Ábrahám1, Mátyás Jókai1, Saki Kondo1,2, Rezieh Mohammadi1, János Fehér3, Dóra Szabó4, Marta Wilhelm5,6, Zsolt Radák7,8,9.
Abstract
It has been demonstrated that physical exercise and probiotic supplementation delay the progress of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in male APP/PS1TG mice. However, it has also been suggested that both exercise and AD have systemic effects. We have studied the effects of exercise training and probiotic treatment on microbiome and biochemical signalling proteins in the liver. The results suggest that liver is under oxidative stress, since SOD2 levels of APP/PS1 mice were decreased when compared to a wild type of mice. Exercise training prevented this decrease. We did not find significant changes in COX4, SIRT3, PGC-1a or GLUT4 levels, while the changes in pAMPK/AMPK, pmTOR/mTOR, pS6/S6 and NRF2 levels were randomly modulated. The data suggest that exercise and probiotics-induced changes in microbiome do not strongly affect mitochondrial density or protein synthesis-related AMPK/mTOR/S6 pathways in the liver of these animals.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Exercise; Liver; Metabolism; Microbiome; Probiotics
Year: 2020 PMID: 32812166 PMCID: PMC7541368 DOI: 10.1007/s10522-020-09895-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biogerontology ISSN: 1389-5729 Impact factor: 4.277
Fig. 1The effects of exercise and probiotic treatments on the gut microbiome of wild and APP/PS1 transgenic mice. The figure shows the bacterial content of wild type (Wt), (APP/PS1TG-C), exercise trained (APP/PS1TG-E), probiotic treated (APP/PS1TG-P), and combined (exercise trained and probiotic treatment, APP/PS1TG-E-P) groups (n = 6)
Fig. 2The effects of exercise and probiotic treatments on selected protein contents. Exercise and probiotic treatments randomly altered the selected protein concentrations in the livers of wild and transgenic animals. Wild type (Wt), control (APP/PS1TG-C), exercise trained (APP/PS1TG-E), probiotic treated (APP/PS1TG-P), and combined (exercise trained and probiotic treatment, APP/PS1TG-E-P) groups (n = 6). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 versus control group, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 versus Wt group. The lines above the columns indicate the significant differences between the groups (E-P vs. P; E vs. E-P)