Literature DB >> 32810820

Tracking chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia diversity at the single cell level.

Eric Solary1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32810820      PMCID: PMC7452428          DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EBioMedicine        ISSN: 2352-3964            Impact factor:   8.143


× No keyword cloud information.
Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) is a prototypic myeloid neoplasm that associates features of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neosplasms. This rare and severe overlap disease is a very diverse clinical entity. Yet, genomic underpinnings of CMML combine a restricted number of somatic mutations in DNA methylation, histone modifier, splicing factor and signaling genes [1]. The discordance between mutational simplicity and clinical heterogeneity has suggested multiple explanations, from underestimation of genetic diversity to a prominent role of epigenomic and cell extrinsic factors [2, 3]. In this issue of EBioMedicine, Wiseman et al. [4] analyze gene expression at the single cell level to track CMML diversity within and between individual patients. They focus on sorted bone marrow Lin−CD34+CD38− cells, a cell population enriched in disease initiating cells. This analysis, performed in seven patients compared to three healthy donors, identifies intra-patient heterogeneity at the stem cell level. It also suggests the persistence of healthy stem cells beside leukaemic cells, and shows differences in gene expression between CMML-1 and CMML-2, two disease categories defined by the percentage of blast cells in the bone marrow and a distinct outcome. Considered together, CMML stem and progenitor cells with a CD34+CD38− phenotype show the up-regulation of genes involved in cytokine and chemokine signaling pathways as compared to healthy donor cells. This up-regulation enforces the suspicion that the cytokine milieu, whose make-up involves immature and mature cells of the leukaemic clone as well as cells of the bone marrow stroma, plays a role in CMML initiation and progression [5, 6]. Differentially expressed genes also indicate an early engagement of CMML cells into granulo-monocytic lineage differentiation as compared to healthy donor cells. Behind these common features, Wiseman et al. [4] observe that CMML samples demonstrate a striking inter-individual heterogeneity, each of the studied samples clustering separately on two-dimensional visualization of highly variable genes by the non-linear technique named t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE algorithm). This diversity was confirmed by unsupervised iterative clustering of differentially expressed genes, which generated 17 clusters. While healthy donor cells almost exclusively matched with one of these clusters, variable fractions of CMML cells of each individual were assigned to several clusters, adding intra-clonal diversity to inter-individual heterogeneity. Remarkably, all but one of the tested CMML samples contained a significant fraction of cells matching with the major healthy donor cell cluster, possibly indicating the persistence of wild-type cells, even though some differentially expressed genes could be detected in cells of this common cluster between patients and healthy donors. CMML cells that match with the main healthy donor cluster could be persistent wild-type cells modified by their pathological environment, or cells of the leukaemic clone with limited changes in gene expression. The 2016 iteration of the WHO classification of myeloid malignancies outlined two parameters related to patient outcome. The fraction of bone marrow blast cells distinguishes CMML-0, CMML-1 and CMML-2, the latter category being defined by a fraction of blast cells between 10% and 20% of bone marrow cells and the worst outcome. Comparing single cell gene expression in CMML-0/1 and CMML-2, Wiseman et al. [4] identify striking segregation of CMML-2 CD34+CD38−cells, which is nicely illustrated by pseudotime ordering analysis. Interestingly, such a transcriptome-based dichotomy was not observed between dysplastic and proliferative CMML, the other distinctive categories identified by the WHO. This suggests that exacerbated sensitivity to cytokines and growth factors such as GM-CSF that drives the proliferative component of the disease [9] depends less on transcriptional changes in the stem and progenitor cell compartment. The first analysis of gene expression performed at the single cell level in CMML identifies new components in disease diversity whose origin has now to be clarified. Previous analysis of CMML clonal architecture demonstrated the co-existence of stem and progenitor cells with various numbers of somatic mutations, contrasting with the exclusive expansion of the most mutated cells with differentiation [7]. This analysis also showed early clonal dominance, with inconstant detection of wild-type CD34+CD38CD90+ cells [7]. Integration of genotyping, eg, by using Genotyping of Transcriptomes (GoT) [8], and chromatin accessibility analysis, e.g., by using Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC-Seq) [10], with single-cell RNA sequencing will further indicate the persistence of wild-type cells and to what extent their behavior is altered by a pathological environment. To be sustainably efficient, CMML therapy may promote the expansion of residual, wild-type stem cells and their differentiation into mature cells, which is hardly obtained with current therapies such as demethylating drugs [1]. A better understanding of disease diversity components may indicate the need to reprogram residual wild-type stem cells before expansion, guiding the choice of innovative strategies to develop in CMML.

Declaration of Interests

The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose.
  10 in total

Review 1.  When clinical heterogeneity exceeds genetic heterogeneity: thinking outside the genomic box in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Markus Ball; Alan F List; Eric Padron
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  The transcriptome of CMML monocytes is highly inflammatory and reflects leukemia-specific and age-related alterations.

Authors:  Anca Franzini; Anthony D Pomicter; Dongqing Yan; Jamshid S Khorashad; Srinivas K Tantravahi; Hein Than; Jonathan M Ahmann; Thomas O'Hare; Michael W Deininger
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-10-22

3.  Heterogeneous expression of cytokines accounts for clinical diversity and refines prognostication in CMML.

Authors:  Sandrine Niyongere; Nolwenn Lucas; Jun-Min Zhou; Samer Sansil; Anthony D Pomicter; Maria E Balasis; John Robinson; Jodi Kroeger; Qing Zhang; Yu Long Zhao; Markus Ball; Rami Komrokji; Alan List; Michael W Deininger; Brooke L Fridley; Valeria Santini; Eric Solary; Eric Padron
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Phase 1 study of lenzilumab, a recombinant anti-human GM-CSF antibody, for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Mrinal M Patnaik; David A Sallman; Abhishek A Mangaonkar; Rachel Heuer; Jeffery Hirvela; Darci Zblewski; Aref Al-Kali; Moritz Binder; Maria E Balasis; Hannah Newman; Christopher Letson; Traci L Kruer; Naseema Gangat; Rami S Komrokji; Ayalew Tefferi; Adrian Lo; Ted Shih; Cameron Durrant; Alan F List; Eric Padron
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Clonal architecture of chronic myelomonocytic leukemias.

Authors:  Raphaël Itzykson; Olivier Kosmider; Aline Renneville; Margot Morabito; Claude Preudhomme; Céline Berthon; Lionel Adès; Pierre Fenaux; Uwe Platzbecker; Olivier Gagey; Philippe Rameau; Guillaume Meurice; Cédric Oréar; François Delhommeau; Olivier A Bernard; Michaela Fontenay; William Vainchenker; Nathalie Droin; Eric Solary
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation.

Authors:  Jason D Buenrostro; Beijing Wu; Ulrike M Litzenburger; Dave Ruff; Michael L Gonzales; Michael P Snyder; Howard Y Chang; William J Greenleaf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mutation allele burden remains unchanged in chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia responding to hypomethylating agents.

Authors:  Jane Merlevede; Nathalie Droin; Tingting Qin; Kristen Meldi; Kenichi Yoshida; Margot Morabito; Emilie Chautard; Didier Auboeuf; Pierre Fenaux; Thorsten Braun; Raphael Itzykson; Stéphane de Botton; Bruno Quesnel; Thérèse Commes; Eric Jourdan; William Vainchenker; Olivier Bernard; Noemie Pata-Merci; Stéphanie Solier; Velimir Gayevskiy; Marcel E Dinger; Mark J Cowley; Dorothée Selimoglu-Buet; Vincent Meyer; François Artiguenave; Jean-François Deleuze; Claude Preudhomme; Michael R Stratton; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Eric Padron; Seishi Ogawa; Serge Koscielny; Maria Figueroa; Eric Solary
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Somatic mutations and cell identity linked by Genotyping of Transcriptomes.

Authors:  Anna S Nam; Kyu-Tae Kim; Ronan Chaligne; Franco Izzo; Chelston Ang; Justin Taylor; Robert M Myers; Ghaith Abu-Zeinah; Ryan Brand; Nathaniel D Omans; Alicia Alonso; Caroline Sheridan; Marisa Mariani; Xiaoguang Dai; Eoghan Harrington; Alessandro Pastore; Juan R Cubillos-Ruiz; Wayne Tam; Ronald Hoffman; Raul Rabadan; Joseph M Scandura; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Peter Smibert; Dan A Landau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Multilayer intraclonal heterogeneity in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Allan Beke; Lucie Laplane; Julie Riviere; Qin Yang; Miguel Torres-Martin; Thibault Dayris; Philippe Rameau; Veronique Saada; Chrystèle Bilhou-Nabera; Ana Hurtado; Larissa Lordier; William Vainchenker; Maria E Figueroa; Nathalie Droin; Eric Solary
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia stem cell transcriptomes anticipate disease morphology and outcome.

Authors:  Daniel H Wiseman; Syed M Baker; Arundhati V Dongre; Kristian Gurashi; Joanna A Storer; Tim Cp Somervaille; Kiran Batta
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 8.143

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.