Literature DB >> 32810697

A comparison of young children's spatiotemporal measures of walking and running in three common types of footwear compared to bare feet.

Simone Cranage1, Luke Perraton2, Kelly-Ann Bowles3, Cylie Williams4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinicians and footwear manufacturers often advise young children to wear soft-soled footwear when they are first learning to walk. There is limited evidence as to why this advice is given, and if soft-soled shoes are as close to barefoot as thought. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the differences in spatiotemporal measures of gait during walking and running in three common types of children's footwear with a soft-soled compared to barefoot in young children?
METHODS: The study used a quasi-experimental design, with the condition order randomised using a Latin square sequence. Forty-seven children were recruited (2 - 4 years). Participants walked or ran the length of a GAITrite mat in a randomized order for barefoot and soft-soled sneaker, boot and sandal conditions. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate the main effect of each soft-soled footwear compared to bare feet in the different gait parameters.
RESULTS: For walking and running trials, cadence decreased whereas step time and stride length increased in all footwear types compared to the barefoot condition. While wearing sneakers and sandals increased the stance percentage for walking and running trials, compared to barefoot, this difference was only apparent during the running trial for the boots. Likewise, although double support time increased for both the boots and sneakers in walking and running, compared to barefoot, this difference was only observed in the sandals during walking. SIGNIFICANCE: This research found that various types of soft-soled footwear impacted gait compared to the barefoot condition, with some differences seen between walking and running trials. These findings challenge the assumption that soft-soled footwear facilitate a similar gait to barefoot walking and running, although the clinical significance of these differences is unknown.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barefoot; Gait; Shoes; Sole; Toddler; footwear

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32810697     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.07.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  5 in total

1.  Young children's footwear taxonomy: An international Delphi survey of parents, health and footwear industry professionals.

Authors:  Cylie M Williams; Stewart C Morrison; Kade Paterson; Katherine Gobbi; Sam Burton; Matthew Hill; Emma Harber; Helen Banwell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Comparison of Shod and Unshod Gait in Patients With Parkinson's Disease With Subthalamic and Nigral Stimulation.

Authors:  Martin A Horn; Alessandro Gulberti; Ute Hidding; Christian Gerloff; Wolfgang Hamel; Christian K E Moll; Monika Pötter-Nerger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  The Influence of the Shoe over the Medial Foot Arch and the Lower Limbs Kinematics in Toddlers.

Authors:  Liria Akie Okai-Nobrega; Thiago Ribeiro Teles Santos; Ana Paula Lage; Priscila Albuquerque de Araújo; Thales Rezende de Souza; Sérgio Teixeira Fonseca
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-01-24

4.  Parents, health professionals and footwear stakeholders' beliefs on the importance of different features of young children's footwear: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Cylie M Williams; Helen A Banwell; Kade L Paterson; Katherine Gobbi; Sam Burton; Matthew Hill; Emma Harber; Stewart C Morrison
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Children should be seen and also heard: an explorative qualitative study into the influences on children's choice of footwear, their perception of comfort and the language they use to describe footwear experiences.

Authors:  Carina Price; Sue Skidmore; Jane Ratcliffe; Anita Williams
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.303

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.