Mohsen Merati1, Mohammad Ali Kazemi2, Sasan Dabiri3, Ali Kouhi4. 1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Radiology, Amir Alam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amir Alam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. s-dabiri@tums.ac.ir. 4. Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amir Alam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To localize the facial nerve course in the mastoid segment and to measure its distances relative to the tympanic membrane. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study. During 2019 in a tertiary hospital, 129 non-contrast and non-pathologic temporal CT images were studied in a tertiary hospital. Facial nerve distances were measured from the planes passing through the annulus in the axial cross-sections at superior, umbo, and inferior levels of the tympanic membrane. It was done in two different dimensions which are anteroposterior (toward the plane of the ear canal wall) and mediolateral (toward the plane of the tympanic membrane). RESULTS: The least mean anteroposterior distance between the facial nerve and the posterior ear canal wall was at the level of umbo (3.66 ± 0.76 mm). The nearest point of the nerve toward the tympanic membrane was the inferior level (- 0.03 ± 0.81 mm). Overall external ear canal lengths were statistically significantly lower in women rather than men. There was a reverse correlation between the age and the ear canal length. CONCLUSION: Posterior canalplasty seems to be safe unless dissection does not cross the plane of annulus. In this study, the safe margin was 1.4 mm in posterior canal wall drilling. It also should be performed carefully if it extends to the inferior side of the canal. Measuring the mediolateral dimension of the nerve toward the annulus in the axial CT images seems to be practically beneficial, especially in the inferior where the ear canal wall turns and might not act as a good landmark. Paying attention to this plane may reduce the risks of nerve injury in any procedures with transcanal approaches, particularly in inferior canaloplasty.
PURPOSE: To localize the facial nerve course in the mastoid segment and to measure its distances relative to the tympanic membrane. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study. During 2019 in a tertiary hospital, 129 non-contrast and non-pathologic temporal CT images were studied in a tertiary hospital. Facial nerve distances were measured from the planes passing through the annulus in the axial cross-sections at superior, umbo, and inferior levels of the tympanic membrane. It was done in two different dimensions which are anteroposterior (toward the plane of the ear canal wall) and mediolateral (toward the plane of the tympanic membrane). RESULTS: The least mean anteroposterior distance between the facial nerve and the posterior ear canal wall was at the level of umbo (3.66 ± 0.76 mm). The nearest point of the nerve toward the tympanic membrane was the inferior level (- 0.03 ± 0.81 mm). Overall external ear canal lengths were statistically significantly lower in women rather than men. There was a reverse correlation between the age and the ear canal length. CONCLUSION: Posterior canalplasty seems to be safe unless dissection does not cross the plane of annulus. In this study, the safe margin was 1.4 mm in posterior canal wall drilling. It also should be performed carefully if it extends to the inferior side of the canal. Measuring the mediolateral dimension of the nerve toward the annulus in the axial CT images seems to be practically beneficial, especially in the inferior where the ear canal wall turns and might not act as a good landmark. Paying attention to this plane may reduce the risks of nerve injury in any procedures with transcanal approaches, particularly in inferior canaloplasty.