Literature DB >> 32808887

Radiologists Make More Errors Interpreting Off-Hours Body CT Studies during Overnight Assignments as Compared with Daytime Assignments.

Anika G Patel1, Victor J Pizzitola1, C Daniel Johnson1, Nan Zhang1, Maitray D Patel1.   

Abstract

Background There is increasing research attention on the impact of overnight work on radiologist performance. Prior studies on overnight imaging interpretive errors have focused on radiology residents, not on the relative performance of board-eligible or board-certified radiologists at night compared with during the day. Purpose To analyze the rate of clinically important interpretation errors on CT examinations of the abdomen, pelvis, or both ("body CT studies") committed by radiology fellows working off-hours based on day or night assignment. Materials and Methods Between July 2014 and June 2018, attending physicians at one tertiary care institution reviewed all body CT studies independently interpreted off-hours by radiologists in an academic fellowship within 10 hours of initial interpretation. Discrepancies affecting acute or follow-up clinical care were classified as errors. In this retrospective study, the error rate for studies interpreted during the day (between 7:00 am and 5:59 pm) was compared with that of studies interpreted at night (between 6:00 pm and 6:59 am). Error rate in the first half of day and night assignments was compared with error rate in the latter half. Statistical analyses used χ2 tests and general estimating equations; significance was defined as P < .05. Results There were 10 090 body CT studies interpreted by 32 radiologists. Forty-four of 2195 daytime studies (2.0%) had errors compared with 240 of 7895 nighttime studies (3.0%; P = .02). Twenty-two of 32 (69%) radiologists had higher error rates for night cases (P = .03). There were more errors in the last half of a night assignment (125 of 3358, 3.7%; P = .002) compared with the first half (115 of 4537, 2.5%). Conclusion On the basis of a subspecialty review, clinically important off-hours body CT interpretation errors occurred more frequently overnight and more frequently in the latter half of assignments, with more radiologists having worse error rates at night compared with the day. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Bruno in this issue.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32808887     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020201558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

1.  Variations in breast cancer detection rates during mammogram-reading sessions: does experience have an impact?

Authors:  Abdulaziz S Alshabibi; Moayyad E Suleiman; Salman M Albeshan; Robert Heard; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Mandating Limits on Workload, Duty, and Speed in Radiology.

Authors:  Robert Alexander; Stephen Waite; Michael A Bruno; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Leonard Berlin; Stephen Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 29.146

3.  Evaluation of neuroradiology emergency MRI interpretations: low discrepancy rates between on-call radiology residents' preliminary interpretations and neuroradiologists' final reports.

Authors:  Diana Salca; François Lersy; Thibault Willaume; Marie Stoessel; Agnieszka Lefèvre; François-Daniel Ardellier; Caroline Nicolaï; Abtine Nouri; Seyyid Baloglu; Guillaume Bierry; Agathe Chammas; Stéphane Kremer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 7.034

4.  Reevaluation of missed lung cancer with artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Serge Sicular; Mehmet Alpaslan; Francis A Ortega; Nora Keathley; Srivas Venkatesh; Rebecca M Jones; Robert V Lindsey
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-08-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.