Literature DB >> 32808858

Treatment of Bacteremia Caused by Enterobacter spp.: Should the Potential for AmpC Induction Dictate Therapy? A Retrospective Study.

Genady Drozdinsky1, Ami Neuberger2,3, Stav Rakedzon3, Ortal Nelgas3, Yonat Cohen3, Nurith Rudich3, Liza Mushinsky3, Haim Ben-Zvi4, Mical Paul2,3, Dafna Yahav5,6.   

Abstract

Objective: Carbapenems are considered treatment of choice for bacteremia caused by potential AmpC-producing bacteria, including Enterobacter spp. We aimed to compare mortality following carbapenem vs. alternative antibiotics for the treatment of Enterobacter spp. bacteremia. Patients and
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in two centers in Israel. We included hospitalized patients with Enterobacter bacteremia treated with third-generation cephalosporins (3GC), piperacillin/tazobactam, quinolones, or carbapenem monotherapy as the main antibiotic in the first week of treatment, between 2010 and 2017. Cefepime was excluded due to nonavailability during study years. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted, introducing the main antibiotic as an independent variable.
Results: Two hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients were included in the analyses. Of these, 73 were treated with 3GC, 39 with piperacillin/tazobactam, 104 with quinolones, and 61 with carbapenems. All-cause 30-day mortality was 16% (45 patients). The type of antibiotics was not significantly associated with mortality on univariate or multivariate analyses. With carbapenems as reference, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for mortality were 0.708, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.231-2.176 with 3GC; OR 1.172, 95% CI 0.388-3.537 with piperacillin/tazobactam; and OR 0.586, 95% CI 0.229-1.4 with quinolones. The main antibiotic was not associated with repeated growth of Entrobacter spp. in blood cultures or other clinical specimens. Resistance development was observed with 3GC and piperacillin/tazobactam. Conclusions: Carbapenem treatment was not advantageous to alternative antibiotics, including 3GC, among patients with Enterobacter spp. bacteremia in an observational study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AmpC; Enterobacter; bacteremia; carbapenems

Year:  2020        PMID: 32808858     DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Drug Resist        ISSN: 1076-6294            Impact factor:   3.431


  2 in total

Review 1.  Is Piperacillin-Tazobactam an Appropriate Empirical Agent for Hospital-Acquired Sepsis and Community-Acquired Septic Shock of Unknown Origin in Australia?

Authors:  Alice Gage-Brown; Catherine George; Jenna Maleki; Kasha P Singh; Stephen Muhi
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-05

2.  Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacter spp, Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp, or Serratia marcescens: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MERINO-2).

Authors:  Adam G Stewart; David L Paterson; Barnaby Young; David C Lye; Joshua S Davis; Kellie Schneider; Mesut Yilmaz; Rumeysa Dinleyici; Naomi Runnegar; Andrew Henderson; Sophia Archuleta; Shirin Kalimuddin; Brian M Forde; Mark D Chatfield; Michelle J Bauer; Jeffrey Lipman; Tiffany Harris-Brown; Patrick N A Harris
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.835

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.