Literature DB >> 32808431

Spatial inequities of mental health nurses in rural and remote Australia.

Nyoman Sutarsa1,2, Michelle Banfield3, Jason Passioura4, Paul Konings4, Malcolm Moore1.   

Abstract

Despite an increased burden from chronic mental health conditions, access to effective mental health services in rural and remote areas is limited, and these services remain spatially undefined. We examine the spatial availability of mental health nurses across local government areas in Australia and identify gaps in mental health service delivery capacity in a finer-grained level than the state/territory data. A spatial distribution of mental health nurses was conducted. We utilized the 2017 National Health Workforce Dataset which was aggregated to LGA level based on the 2018 Australian Bureau Statistics (ABS) Data. The availability of mental health nurses was measured using the full time equivalent (FTE) rates per 100 000 population. We calculated the proportion of LGAs with zero total FTE rates based on remoteness categories. We also compared the mean of total FTE rates based on remoteness categories using analysis of variance. A spatial distribution of mental health nurses was visualized using GIS software for total FTE rates. Our analysis included 544 LGA across Australia, with 24.8% being defined as remote and very remote. The mean total FTE for mental health nurses per 100 000 populations is 56.6 (±132.2) with a median of 17.4 (IQR: 61.8). A wide standard deviation reflects unequal distribution of mental health nurses across LGAs. The availability of total FTE rates for mental health nurses per 100 000 populations is significantly lower in remote and very remote LGAs in comparison with major cities. As many as 35.1% of LGAs across Australia have no FTE for mental health nurses with 46% are remote and very remote. Our study reflects the existing unequal distribution of mental health nurses between metropolitan/urban setting and rural and remote areas. We suggest three broad strategies to address these spatial inequities: improving supply and data information systems; revisiting task-shifting strategies, retraining the existing health workforce to develop skills necessary for mental health care to rural and remote communities; and incorporating the provision of mental health services within expanding innovative delivery models including consumer-led, telemedicine and community-based groups.
© 2020 Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community-based service; health service delivery; health workforce; mental health; nurses

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32808431     DOI: 10.1111/inm.12769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1445-8330            Impact factor:   3.503


  3 in total

1.  Cohort study comparison of Mental Health and Wellbeing Services delivered by The Royal Flying Doctor Service, across Far North and Central West Queensland.

Authors:  Fergus Gardiner; Jocelyn Middleton; Shamela Perera; Mikayla Gunner; Leonid Churilov; Mathew Coleman; Lee Poole
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2022-02-02

2.  Mental health nursing practice in rural and remote Canada: Insights from a national survey.

Authors:  Martha L P MacLeod; Kelly L Penz; Davina Banner; Sharleen Jahner; Irene Koren; Alexandra Thomlinson; Pertice Moffitt; Mary Ellen Labrecque
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 5.100

3.  Remote mental health clients prefer face-to-face consultations to telehealth during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Andrew James Amos; Jocelyn Middleton; Fergus W Gardiner
Journal:  Australas Psychiatry       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 1.369

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.