Literature DB >> 32808320

Care of international living kidney donor candidates in the United States: A survey of contemporary experience, practice, and challenges.

Krista L Lentine1, Jennifer D Motter2, Macey L Henderson2, Rebecca E Hays3, Ellen Shukhman4, Julia Hunt5, Fawaz Al Ammary2, Vineeta Kumar6, Dianne LaPointe Rudow5, Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen2, Angie G Nishio-Lucar7, Heidi M Schaefer8, Matthew Cooper9, Didier A Mandelbrot4.   

Abstract

The evaluation and care of non-US citizen, non-US residents who wish to come to the United States to serve as international living kidney donors (ILKDs) can pose unique challenges. We surveyed US transplant programs to better understand practices related to ILKD care. We distributed the survey by email and professional society list-servs (Fall 2018, assessing 2017 experience). Eighty-five programs responded (36.8% program response rate), of which 80 considered ILKD candidates. Only 18 programs had written protocols for ILKD evaluation. Programs had a median of 3 (range: 0,75) ILKD candidates who initiated contact during the year, from origin countries spanning 6 continents. Fewer (median: 1, range: 0,25) were approved for donation. Program-reported reasons for not completing ILKD evaluations included visa barriers (58.6%), inability to complete evaluation (34.3%), concerns regarding follow-up (31.4%) or other healthcare access (28.6%), and financial impacts (21.4%). Programs that did not evaluate ILKDs reported similar concerns. Staff time required to evaluate ILKDs was estimated as 1.5-to-3-times (47.9%) or >3-times (32.9%) that needed for domestic candidates. Among programs accepting ILKDs, on average 55% reported successful completion of 1-year follow-up. ILKD evaluation is a resource-intensive process with variable outcomes. Planning and commitment are necessary to care for this unique candidate group.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  international donor; living donor kidney transplantation; living kidney donation; logistics; practices; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32808320     DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  4 in total

1.  Deceased Donor Procurement Biopsy Practices, Interpretation, and Histology-Based Decision-Making: A Survey of US Kidney Transplant Centers.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Vidya A Fleetwood; Yasar Caliskan; Henry Randall; Jason R Wellen; Melissa Lichtenberger; Craig Dedert; Richard Rothweiler; Gary Marklin; Diane Brockmeier; Mark A Schnitzler; Syed A Husain; Sumit Mohan; Bertram L Kasiske; Matthew Cooper; Roslyn B Mannon; David A Axelrod
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-03-28

2.  Transplant Clinician Opinions on Use of Race in the Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate.

Authors:  Mona D Doshi; Neeraj Singh; Benjamin E Hippen; Kenneth J Woodside; Prince Mohan; Hannah L Byford; Matthew Cooper; Darshana M Dadhania; Sruthi Ainapurapu; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 10.614

3.  Survey of current transplant center practices regarding COVID-19 vaccine mandates in the United States.

Authors:  Benjamin E Hippen; David A Axelrod; Kennan Maher; Ruixin Li; Deepali Kumar; Yasar Caliskan; Tarek Alhamad; Mark Schnitzler; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 9.369

Review 4.  Managing the Costs of Routine Follow-up Care After Living Kidney Donation: a Review and Survey of Contemporary Experience, Practices, and Challenges.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Nagaraju Sarabu; Gwen McNatt; Robert Howey; Rebecca Hays; Christie P Thomas; Ursula Lebron-Banks; Linda Ohler; Cody Wooley; Addie Wisniewski; Huiling Xiao; Andrea Tietjen
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2022-09-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.