Literature DB >> 32808015

Validation of the Swedish Diabetes Re-Grouping Scheme in Adult-Onset Diabetes in China.

Xia Li1,2,3, Shuting Yang1,2,3, Chuqing Cao1,2,3, Xiang Yan1,2,3, Lei Zheng4, Lanbo Zheng4, Jiarui Da4, Xiaohan Tang1,2,3, Linong Ji5, Xilin Yang6, Zhiguang Zhou1,2,3.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: This study applied the Swedish novel data-driven classification in Chinese newly diagnosed diabetic patients and validated its adoptability.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the practicality of the Swedish diabetes regrouping scheme in Chinese adults with newly diagnosed diabetes.
DESIGN: Patients were classified into 5 subgroups by K-means and Two-Step methods according to 6 clinical parameters.
SETTING: Ambulatory care. PATIENTS: A cross-sectional survey of 15 772 patients with adult-onset newly diagnosed diabetes was conducted in China from April 2015 to October 2017. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six parameters including glutamate decarboxylase antibodies (GADA), age of onset, body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), homoeostatic model assessment 2 estimates of β-cell function (HOMA2-B) and insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) were measured to calculate the patient subgroups.
RESULTS: Our patients clustered into 5 subgroups: 6.2% were in the severe autoimmune diabetes (SAID) subgroup, 24.8% were in the severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD) subgroup, 16.6% were in the severe insulin-resistance diabetes (SIRD) subgroup, 21.6% were in the mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD) subgroup and 30.9% were in the mild age-related diabetes (MARD) subgroup. When compared with the Swedish population, the proportion of SIDD subgroup was higher. In general, Chinese patients had younger age, lower BMI, higher HbA1c, lower HOMA2-B and HOMA2-IR, and higher insulin use but lower metformin usage than the Swedish patients.
CONCLUSION: The Swedish diabetes regrouping scheme is applicable to adult-onset diabetes in China, with a high proportion of patients with the severe insulin deficient diabetes. Further validations of long-term diabetes complications remain warranted in future studies. © Endocrine Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clustering; diabetes; novel classification; precision medicine; validation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32808015     DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  5 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology, phenotypes and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Indian and Chinese populations.

Authors:  Calvin Ke; K M Venkat Narayan; Juliana C N Chan; Prabhat Jha; Baiju R Shah
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 47.564

2.  Diabetes subgroups and risk for complications: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Michael P Bancks; Mercedes Carnethon; Haiying Chen; Mary Frances Cotch; Barbara Klein; Ronald Klein; Moyses Szklo; Alain Bertoni
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.219

3.  Assessing reproducibility and utility of clustering of patients with type 2 diabetes and established CV disease (SAVOR -TIMI 53 trial).

Authors:  Yasunori Aoki; Bengt Hamrén; Lindsay E Clegg; Christina Stahre; Deepak L Bhatt; Itamar Raz; Benjamin M Scirica; Jan Oscarsson; Björn Carlsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Usefulness of subclassification of adult diabetes mellitus among inpatients in Japan.

Authors:  Kohei Saito; Tatsuhide Inoue; Hiroyuki Ariyasu; Toshio Shimada; Hiroshi Itoh; Issei Tanaka; Chikashi Terao
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 5.  Phenotypic and genetic classification of diabetes.

Authors:  Aaron J Deutsch; Emma Ahlqvist; Miriam S Udler
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 10.460

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.