Moritz T Winkelmann1, Sven S Walter2, Lior Laver3, Florian Zeman4, Kai Fehske5, Leonard Achenbach5. 1. Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 2. Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. Electronic address: sven.walter@med.uni-tuebingen.de. 3. Department for Othopedics, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK. 4. Department for Clinical Studies, Centre for Clinical Studies, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 5. Department of Trauma, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Range of motion adaptations in the shoulders of overhead throwing athletes have been reported, but knowledge about the development of soft-tissue adaptations is limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in posterior shoulder capsule thickness and internal rotation between the throwing and non-throwing shoulder. METHODS: On the basis of the sample size calculation, we assessed 63 youth elite handball players (33 boys and 30 girls, mean age: 13.6 ± 0.9 years) for glenohumeral internal and external rotational range of motion, humeral retrotorsion, and posterior capsule thickness (PCT) with a manual goniometer and a portable ultrasound device and calculated sports-specific differences between the throwing and non-throwing shoulder as well as correlations with PCT. RESULTS: Youth handball players showed side-to-side differences in internal rotation, external rotation, and humeral retrotorsion between the throwing and non-throwing shoulder. Posterior shoulder capsules were 1.21 times thicker (95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.3) in the throwing shoulder than in the non-throwing shoulder (1.3 ± 0.3 mm vs. 1.2 ± 0.2 mm, P < .0001). Loss of internal rotation did not correlate with PCT. CONCLUSIONS: In youth elite handball athletes, posterior shoulder tightness and subsequent sports-specific loss of internal rotation in the throwing shoulder are not related to PCT. Thus, in this age class, other (soft-tissue) factors must be responsible for this condition.
PURPOSE: Range of motion adaptations in the shoulders of overhead throwing athletes have been reported, but knowledge about the development of soft-tissue adaptations is limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in posterior shoulder capsule thickness and internal rotation between the throwing and non-throwing shoulder. METHODS: On the basis of the sample size calculation, we assessed 63 youth elite handball players (33 boys and 30 girls, mean age: 13.6 ± 0.9 years) for glenohumeral internal and external rotational range of motion, humeral retrotorsion, and posterior capsule thickness (PCT) with a manual goniometer and a portable ultrasound device and calculated sports-specific differences between the throwing and non-throwing shoulder as well as correlations with PCT. RESULTS: Youth handball players showed side-to-side differences in internal rotation, external rotation, and humeral retrotorsion between the throwing and non-throwing shoulder. Posterior shoulder capsules were 1.21 times thicker (95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.3) in the throwing shoulder than in the non-throwing shoulder (1.3 ± 0.3 mm vs. 1.2 ± 0.2 mm, P < .0001). Loss of internal rotation did not correlate with PCT. CONCLUSIONS: In youth elite handball athletes, posterior shoulder tightness and subsequent sports-specific loss of internal rotation in the throwing shoulder are not related to PCT. Thus, in this age class, other (soft-tissue) factors must be responsible for this condition.
Authors: Leonard Achenbach; Gunnar Huppertz; Florian Zeman; Johannes Weber; Patrick Luig; Maximilian Rudert; Werner Krutsch Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2022-03-11