Literature DB >> 32804883

Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 226.

.   

Abstract

Prenatal testing for chromosomal abnormalities is designed to provide an accurate assessment of a patient's risk of carrying a fetus with a chromosomal disorder. A wide variety of prenatal screening and diagnostic tests are available; each offers varying levels of information and performance, and each has relative advantages and limitations. When considering screening test characteristics, no one test is superior in all circumstances, which results in the need for nuanced, patient-centered counseling from the obstetric care professional and complex decision making by the patient. Each patient should be counseled in each pregnancy about options for testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. It is important that obstetric care professionals be prepared to discuss not only the risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities but also the relative benefits and limitations of the available screening and diagnostic tests. Testing for chromosomal abnormalities should be an informed patient choice based on provision of adequate and accurate information, the patient's clinical context, accessible health care resources, values, interests, and goals. All patients should be offered both screening and diagnostic tests, and all patients have the right to accept or decline testing after counseling.The purpose of this Practice Bulletin is to provide current information regarding the available screening test options available for fetal chromosomal abnormalities and to review their benefits, performance characteristics, and limitations. For information regarding prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders, refer to Practice Bulletin No. 162, Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Genetic Disorders. For additional information regarding counseling about genetic testing and communicating test results, refer to Committee Opinion No. 693, Counseling About Genetic Testing and Communication of Genetic Test Results. For information regarding carrier screening for genetic conditions, refer to Committee Opinion No. 690, Carrier Screening in the Age of Genomic Medicine and Committee Opinion No. 691, Carrier Screening for Genetic Conditions. This Practice Bulletin has been revised to further clarify methods of screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities, including expanded information regarding the use of cell-free DNA in all patients regardless of maternal age or baseline risk, and to add guidance related to patient counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32804883     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  27 in total

1.  Supporting students with sex chromosome aneuploidies in educational settings: Results of a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Talia Thompson; Shanlee Davis; Jennifer Janusz; Erin Frith; Laura Pyle; Susan Howell; Richard Boada; Rebecca Wilson; Nicole Tartaglia
Journal:  J Sch Psychol       Date:  2022-06-28

2.  Association of fetal fraction with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy incidence and disease severity.

Authors:  Raj Shree; Teodora R Kolarova; Hayley J MacKinnon; Christina M Lockwood; Suchitra Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  Non-invasive prenatal testing in mitigating concerns from invasive prenatal diagnostic testing: retrospective assessment of utility in an academic healthcare system in the US.

Authors:  Kibum Kim; Linda Kaitlyn Craft
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Genetic counseling decisions in gestational carrier pregnancies.

Authors:  Melody A Rasouli; Hailey E Roberts; David N Jackson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.357

5.  Clinical phenotype and management of individuals with mosaic monosomy X with Y chromosome material stratified by genital phenotype.

Authors:  Lindsey Guzewicz; Susan Howell; Canice E Crerand; Hailey Umbaugh; Natalie J Nokoff; Jennifer Barker; Shanlee M Davis
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 6.  Overview and recent developments in cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Liesbeth Vossaert; Imen Chakchouk; Roni Zemet; Ignatia B Van den Veyver
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.242

Review 7.  Optical Genome Mapping as a Next-Generation Cytogenomic Tool for Detection of Structural and Copy Number Variations for Prenatal Genomic Analyses.

Authors:  Nikhil Shri Sahajpal; Hayk Barseghyan; Ravindra Kolhe; Alex Hastie; Alka Chaubey
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Clinical Efficiency of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening for Common Trisomies in Low-Risk and Twin Pregnancies.

Authors:  Yanfei Xu; Pengzhen Jin; Yu Lei; Yeqing Qian; Yuqing Xu; Miaomiao Wang; Jinglei Jin; Yixuan Yin; Minyue Dong
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 9.  Non-invasive Prenatal Testing, What Patients Do Not Learn, May Be Due to Lack of Specialist Genetic Training by Gynecologists and Obstetricians?

Authors:  Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Postmortem whole-genome sequencing on a dried blood spot identifies a novel homozygous SUOX variant causing isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency.

Authors:  Mallory J Owen; Jerica Lenberg; Annette Feigenbaum; Jeffrey Gold; Kevin Chau; Zaira Bezares-Orin; Yan Ding; Shimul Chowdhury; Stephen F Kingsmore
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2021-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.