Literature DB >> 32804575

Evolving Criteria for Adult and Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.

Varun V Varadarajan1, Sarah A Sydlowski2, Michael M Li1, Samantha Anne2, Oliver F Adunka1.   

Abstract

The indications for cochlear implantation have gradually expanded as advancements in technology have evolved, resulting in improved audiologic outcomes for both adult and children. There remains a significant underutilization of cochlear implant technology in the United States, and recognition of the potential benefits of cochlear implantation for non-traditional indications is critical for encouraging the evolution of candidacy criteria. Adult cochlear implantation candidacy has progressed from patients with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) to include patients with greater degrees of residual hearing, single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing, and atypical etiologies of hearing loss (eg, vestibular schwannoma, Ménière's disease, and otosclerosis). Indications for pediatric cochlear implantation have similarly evolved from children with bilateral severe to profound SNHL to implanting children at a younger age, including those with residual hearing, asymmetric hearing loss, inner ear malformations, as well as cochlear nerve deficiency. In this editorial, the literature investigating cochlear implantation for nontraditional indications is reviewed with an aim to use the best available evidence to encourage the evolution of candidacy criteria.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implant candidacy; cochlear implantation; hearing loss; implantable hearing devices; pediatric hearing loss

Year:  2020        PMID: 32804575     DOI: 10.1177/0145561320947258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J        ISSN: 0145-5613            Impact factor:   1.697


  8 in total

1.  Efficacy of cochlear implants in children with borderline hearing who have already achieved significant language development with hearing aids.

Authors:  Young Seok Kim; Yehree Kim; Seung Jae Lee; Jin Hee Han; Nayoung Yi; Hyo Soon Yoo; Marge Carandang; Sang-Yeon Lee; Bong Jik Kim; Byung Yoon Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Perception of Environmental Sounds in Cochlear Implant Users: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Nathan Luzum; Aaron C Moberly; Michael S Harris
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 3.  Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Adults: Limitations, Expansions, and Opportunities for Improvement.

Authors:  Teresa A Zwolan; Gregory Basura
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2021-12-09

Review 4.  Barriers to Adult Cochlear Implant Care in the United States: An Analysis of Health Care Delivery.

Authors:  Ashley M Nassiri; John P Marinelli; Donna L Sorkin; Matthew L Carlson
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2021-12-09

Review 5.  Guidelines for cochlear implantation in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Musaed A Alzahrani; Nader F Aldajani; Saeed A Alghamdi
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.422

6.  Hearables as a Gateway to Hearing Health Care.

Authors:  Hye Yoon Seol; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.340

7.  Effect of Electrode Insertion Angle on Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Adult and Children Patients with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Ting Fan; Meng-Ya Xiang; Yang Li; Jia-Min Gong; Tao Wu; Yue Wang; Jin Xu; Yun-Feng Wang; Jian Li
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 7.310

8.  Awareness, Perceptions, and Literacy Surrounding Hearing Loss and Hearing Rehabilitation Among the Adult Population in the United States.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; Ashley M Nassiri; John P Marinelli; Christine M Lohse; Sarah A Sydlowski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.311

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.