Literature DB >> 32804299

[Evaluation of outpatient medical pain management in Germany : Results of an internet-based cross-sectional survey among pain specialists in outpatient departments].

V Kriegisch1, B Kuhn2, M-L Dierks3, J Achenbach1, J Briest4, M Fink4, M Dusch1, V Amelung3, M Karst5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: On 31 December 2016, a total of 1206 physicians participated in the outpatient care of chronic pain patients according to the criteria of a special pain management program (QSV). Because of the largely existing shortage of treatment resources for chronic pain patients, there is a lack of data regarding the evaluation of outpatient pain management by highly specialized pain therapists.
METHODS: In a hybrid Delphi procedure, a questionnaire concerning the content, structural and personal assessment of outpatient pain management in Germany was developed. With the help of this instrument, an internet-based cross-sectional survey of 281 QSV pain therapists from four German states (Berlin, Lower Saxony, Saxony, Baden-Württemberg) and of all the heads of university outpatient pain services (n = 36) in Germany was conducted.
RESULTS: The adjusted response rate of the survey was 35.9%. The response rate of the heads of university outpatient pain services was 66.7%. In 91% of the respondents the proportion of chronic pain patients in the medical practices was more than 70%. Whereas 67.3% were satisfied with the situation in their medical practice, 63.4% were dissatisfied with the current organizational structure of the pain management in Germany. They expressed their dissatisfaction especially in terms of budgeting regulations (69.3%), the cooperation with psychotherapists (69.3%) and interdisciplinary networking (50.5%). The 1‑year specialist training in pain management (87.1%) and the completion of a psychosomatic basic care course (90.1%) were assessed as a good preparation for the later profession. A multitude of free comments indicated that the pain specialist training is too short and insufficient. Most of the respondents considered the establishment of a specialist board certification for pain management more suitable from the perspective of physicians (61.4%) and the patients (54.5%). Of the heads of university outpatient pain services 70.8% expressed the wish for autonomous structures with separate budgets and 75.0% indicated that under the current conditions their outpatient pain services are not working profitably. Only 39.7% of the QSV pain therapists provided fellowship training for physicians and 57.6% were planning to retire during the next 10 years.
CONCLUSION: Highly specialized pain therapists are dissatisfied because of the lack of independence of the organizational structure of pain management care and the insufficient interdisciplinary network in outpatient pain management. A possible solution for a better pain management care and the recruitment problems may be the establishment of a board certification for pain management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Board certification for pain management; Insufficient medical care of chronic pain patients; Interdisciplinary chronic pain management on outpatient basis; Organisation of chronic pain management in Germany; Shortage of highly specialized pain therapists

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32804299      PMCID: PMC7997815          DOI: 10.1007/s00482-020-00492-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  8 in total

1.  [Demographic change and disease rates: a projection until 2050].

Authors:  E Peters; R Pritzkuleit; F Beske; A Katalinic
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  [In Process Citation].

Authors:  W Koppert
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  [In Process Citation].

Authors:  R Thoma
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Trends in disease burden in Germany: results, implications and limitations of the Global Burden of Disease study.

Authors:  Dietrich Plass; Theo Vos; Claudia Hornberg; Christa Scheidt-Nave; Hajo Zeeb; Alexander Krämer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  [Cross-sectoral interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy : Recommendations on structural and process parameters of the ad hoc commission "Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy" of the German Pain Society (Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft e.  V.)].

Authors:  M Pfingsten; B Arnold; A Böger; T Brinkschmidt; H-R Casser; D Irnich; U Kaiser; K Klimczyk; J Lutz; M Schiltenwolf; D Seeger; B Zernikow; R Sabatowski
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 6.  Interdisciplinary chronic pain management: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Robert J Gatchel; Donald D McGeary; Cindy A McGeary; Ben Lippe
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2014 Feb-Mar

7.  [Chronic pain, pain disease, and satisfaction of patients with pain treatment in Germany. Results of a representative population survey].

Authors:  W Häuser; G Schmutzer; P Henningsen; E Brähler
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  Over-, under- and misuse of pain treatment in Germany.

Authors:  Markus Dietl; Dieter Korczak
Journal:  GMS Health Technol Assess       Date:  2011-04-19
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Screening of Patient Impairments in an Outpatient Clinic for Suspected Rare Diseases-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Christoph Gutenbrunner; Joerg Schiller; Vega Goedecke; Christina Lemhoefer; Andrea Boekel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.