Literature DB >> 32804270

Electromagnetic interference on cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators during endoscopy as reported to the US Federal Drug Administration.

Jason M Samuels1, Douglas M Overbey1, Krzysztof J Wikiel2, Teresa S Jones2, Thomas N Robinson2, Edward L Jones3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: More than 3 million patients have a cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED) such as a pacemaker or implanted cardioverter-defibrillator in the USA. These devices are susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI) leading to malfunction and injury. Radiofrequency energy, the most common modality for obtaining hemostasis during endoscopy, is the most common source of EMI. Few studies have evaluated the effect of endoscopic radiofrequency energy on CIEDs. We aim to characterize CIED dysfunction related to endoscopic procedures. We hypothesize that EMI from endoscopic energy can result in patient injury.
METHODS: We queried the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for CIED dysfunction related to electrosurgical devices over a 10-year period (2009-2019). CIED dysfunction events were identified using seven problem codes (malfunction, electromagnetic interference, ambient noise, pacing problem, over-sensing, inappropriate shock, defibrillation). These were cross-referenced for the terms "cautery, electrocautery, endoscopy, esophagus, colonoscopy, colon, esophagoscopy, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy." Reports were individually reviewed to confirm and characterize CIED malfunction due to an endoscopic procedure.
RESULTS: A search for CIED dysfunction resulted in 43,759 reports. Three hundred and eleven reports (0.7%) were associated with electrocautery, and of these, 45 reports (14.5%) included endoscopy. Ten reports involving endoscopy (22%) specified upper (3, 7%) or lower (7, 16%) endoscopy while the remainder were non-specific. Twenty-six of reports involving endoscopy (58%) suffered injury because of CIED dysfunction: Of these, 17 (65%) received inappropriate shocks, 5 (19%) had pacing inhibition with bradycardia or asystole, 3 (12%) had CIED damage requiring explant and replacement, and 1 (4%) patient suffered ventricular tachycardia requiring hospital admission.
CONCLUSION: The use of energy during endoscopy can cause dysfunction of CIEDs. This most commonly results in inappropriate defibrillation, symptomatic bradycardia, and asystole. Patients with CIEDs undergoing endoscopy should undergo pre- and post-procedure device interrogation and re-programming to avoid patient injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac implanted electronic devices; Electromagnetic interference; Endoscopy; Implanted cardiac defibrillator; Pacemaker

Year:  2020        PMID: 32804270     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07872-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  1 in total

1.  2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Fred M Kusumoto; Mark H Schoenfeld; Coletta Barrett; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Michael R Gold; Nora F Goldschlager; Robert M Hamilton; José A Joglar; Robert J Kim; Richard Lee; Joseph E Marine; Christopher J McLeod; Keith R Oken; Kristen K Patton; Cara N Pellegrini; Kimberly A Selzman; Annemarie Thompson; Paul D Varosy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 29.690

  1 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Effects of medically generated electromagnetic interference from medical devices on cardiac implantable electronic devices: A review.

Authors:  Walker Barmore; Himax Patel; Cassandra Voong; Caroline Tarallo; Joe B Calkins
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.