BACKGROUND: The compilation of a list of genetic modifiers in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an open research field. The GABAergic system is affected in several neurological disorders but its role in AD is largely understudied. OBJECTIVE/ METHODS: As an explorative study, we considered variants in genes of GABA catabolism (ABAT, ALDH5A1, AKR7A2), and APOE in 300 Italian patients and 299 controls. We introduce a recent multivariate method to take into account the individual APOE genotype, thus controlling for the effect of the discrepant allele distributions in cases versus controls. We add a genotype-phenotype analysis based on age at onset and the Mini-Mental State Evaluation score. RESULTS: On the background of strongly divergent APOE allele distributions in AD versus controls, two genotypic interactions that represented a subtle but significant peculiarity of the AD cohort emerged. The first is between ABAT and APOE, and the second between some ALDH5A1 genotypes and APOE. Decreased SSADH activity is predicted in AD carriers of APOEɛ4, representing an additional suggestion for increased oxidative damage. CONCLUSION: We identified a difference between AD and controls, not in a shift of the allele frequencies at genes of the GABA catabolism pathway, but rather in gene interactions peculiar of the AD cohort. The emerging view is that of a multifactorial contribution to the disease, with a main risk factor (APOE), and additional contributions by the variants here considered. We consider genes of the GABA degradation pathway good candidates as modifiers of AD, contributing to energy impairment in AD brain.
BACKGROUND: The compilation of a list of genetic modifiers in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an open research field. The GABAergic system is affected in several neurological disorders but its role in AD is largely understudied. OBJECTIVE/ METHODS: As an explorative study, we considered variants in genes of GABA catabolism (ABAT, ALDH5A1, AKR7A2), and APOE in 300 Italian patients and 299 controls. We introduce a recent multivariate method to take into account the individual APOE genotype, thus controlling for the effect of the discrepant allele distributions in cases versus controls. We add a genotype-phenotype analysis based on age at onset and the Mini-Mental State Evaluation score. RESULTS: On the background of strongly divergent APOE allele distributions in AD versus controls, two genotypic interactions that represented a subtle but significant peculiarity of the AD cohort emerged. The first is between ABAT and APOE, and the second between some ALDH5A1 genotypes and APOE. Decreased SSADH activity is predicted in AD carriers of APOEɛ4, representing an additional suggestion for increased oxidative damage. CONCLUSION: We identified a difference between AD and controls, not in a shift of the allele frequencies at genes of the GABA catabolism pathway, but rather in gene interactions peculiar of the AD cohort. The emerging view is that of a multifactorial contribution to the disease, with a main risk factor (APOE), and additional contributions by the variants here considered. We consider genes of the GABA degradation pathway good candidates as modifiers of AD, contributing to energy impairment in AD brain.
Entities:
Keywords:
ABAT; AKR7A2; ALDH5A1; Alzheimer’s disease; GABA; association studies; single nucleotide polymorphisms