Belinda Thompson1, Katrina Gaitatzis2, Xanne Janse de Jonge3, Robbie Blackwell2, Louise A Koelmeyer2. 1. Australian Lymphoedema Education, Research & Treatment (ALERT) Program, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 1, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. belinda.thompson@mq.edu.au. 2. Australian Lymphoedema Education, Research & Treatment (ALERT) Program, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 1, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. 3. School of Environmental & Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) massage is widely accepted as a conservative treatment for lymphedema. This systematic review aims to examine the methodologies used in recent research and evaluate the effectiveness of MLD for those at-risk of or living with lymphedema. METHODS: The electronic databases Embase, PubMed, CINAHL Complete and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using relevant terms. Studies comparing MLD with another intervention or control in patients at-risk of or with lymphedema were included. Studies were critically appraised with the PEDro scale. RESULTS: Seventeen studies with a total of 867 female and two male participants were included. Only studies examining breast cancer-related lymphedema were identified. Some studies reported positive effects of MLD on volume reduction, quality of life and symptom-related outcomes compared with other treatments, while other studies reported no additional benefit of MLD as a component of complex decongestive therapy. In patients at-risk, MLD was reported to reduce incidence of lymphedema in some studies, while others reported no such benefits. CONCLUSIONS: The reviewed articles reported conflicting findings and were often limited by methodological issues. This review highlights the need for further experimental studies on the effectiveness of MLD in lymphedema. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: There is some evidence that MLD in early stages following breast cancer surgery may help prevent progression to clinical lymphedema. MLD may also provide additional benefits in volume reduction for mild lymphedema. However, in moderate to severe lymphedema, MLD may not provide additional benefit when combined with complex decongestive therapy.
PURPOSE: Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) massage is widely accepted as a conservative treatment for lymphedema. This systematic review aims to examine the methodologies used in recent research and evaluate the effectiveness of MLD for those at-risk of or living with lymphedema. METHODS: The electronic databases Embase, PubMed, CINAHL Complete and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using relevant terms. Studies comparing MLD with another intervention or control in patients at-risk of or with lymphedema were included. Studies were critically appraised with the PEDro scale. RESULTS: Seventeen studies with a total of 867 female and two male participants were included. Only studies examining breast cancer-related lymphedema were identified. Some studies reported positive effects of MLD on volume reduction, quality of life and symptom-related outcomes compared with other treatments, while other studies reported no additional benefit of MLD as a component of complex decongestive therapy. In patients at-risk, MLD was reported to reduce incidence of lymphedema in some studies, while others reported no such benefits. CONCLUSIONS: The reviewed articles reported conflicting findings and were often limited by methodological issues. This review highlights the need for further experimental studies on the effectiveness of MLD in lymphedema. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: There is some evidence that MLD in early stages following breast cancer surgery may help prevent progression to clinical lymphedema. MLD may also provide additional benefits in volume reduction for mild lymphedema. However, in moderate to severe lymphedema, MLD may not provide additional benefit when combined with complex decongestive therapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Lymphatic therapy; Lymphedema; Manual lymphatic drainage
Authors: A Bergmann; M G da Costa Leite Ferreira; S S de Aguiar; R de Almeida Dias; K de Souza Abrahao; E M Paltrinieri; R G Martinez Allende; M F C Andrade Journal: Lymphology Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 1.286
Authors: Nele Devoogdt; Marie-Rose Christiaens; Inge Geraerts; Steven Truijen; Ann Smeets; Karin Leunen; Patrick Neven; Marijke Van Kampen Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-09-01
Authors: Jose Maria Pereira de Godoy; Henrique Jose Pereira de Godoy; Tania Dias Guimarães; Maria de Fatima Guerreiro Godoy Journal: Int J Health Sci (Qassim) Date: 2021 Sep-Oct
Authors: Lorenzo Lippi; Alessandro de Sire; Luigi Losco; Kamal Mezian; Arianna Folli; Mariia Ivanova; Lorenzo Zattoni; Stefano Moalli; Antonio Ammendolia; Carmine Alfano; Nicola Fusco; Marco Invernizzi Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Jose Maria Pereira de Godoy; Lívia Maria Pereira de Godoy; Henrique Jose Pereira de Godoy; Maria de Fatima Guerreiro Godoy Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-08-25