PURPOSE: Topotecan is a camptothecin analogue with potential advantages over irinotecan for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of hepatic colorectal metastases including greater anti-neoplastic activity without enzymatic activation. The purpose of this study was to assess safety and tolerability of topotecan-loaded radiopaque microspheres (ROMTOP) administered by TACE in a rabbit model and to compare the in vitro elution of topotecan from microspheres to irinotecan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Topotecan was loaded into radiopaque microspheres (70-150 µm, DC Bead LUMI™, Biocompatibles UK Ltd-Boston Scientific Corporation) to the maximum capacity of 80 mg/mL of microspheres. Six healthy New Zealand White rabbits underwent hepatic TACE with ROMTOP under fluoroscopic guidance until angiographic stasis. Assessment of toxicities included regular liver function tests and complete blood counts until euthanasia 28 days post-TACE. In vitro topotecan elution from the microspheres was assessed using an open-loop flow-through system and compared to irinotecan. RESULTS: The mean bead volume and topotecan dose delivered were 0.086 mL (0.076-0.105 mL) and 1.99 mg/kg (1.51-2.55 mg/kg), respectively. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase were elevated post-embolization but resolved within 2 weeks. One rabbit died two days after TACE with pyloric duodenal perforation observed at necropsy, potentially due to non-target embolization. In vitro elution of topotecan from ROMTOP was complete in 10 h compared to 3 h for irinotecan-loaded microspheres. CONCLUSION: Selective embolization with ROMTOP was tolerated at a dose of 2 mg/kg (24 mg/m2) in rabbits. In vitro topotecan elution from microspheres was more prolonged compared to irinotecan.
PURPOSE:Topotecan is a camptothecin analogue with potential advantages over irinotecan for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of hepatic colorectal metastases including greater anti-neoplastic activity without enzymatic activation. The purpose of this study was to assess safety and tolerability of topotecan-loaded radiopaque microspheres (ROMTOP) administered by TACE in a rabbit model and to compare the in vitro elution of topotecan from microspheres to irinotecan. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Topotecan was loaded into radiopaque microspheres (70-150 µm, DC Bead LUMI™, Biocompatibles UK Ltd-Boston Scientific Corporation) to the maximum capacity of 80 mg/mL of microspheres. Six healthy New Zealand White rabbits underwent hepatic TACE with ROMTOP under fluoroscopic guidance until angiographic stasis. Assessment of toxicities included regular liver function tests and complete blood counts until euthanasia 28 days post-TACE. In vitro topotecan elution from the microspheres was assessed using an open-loop flow-through system and compared to irinotecan. RESULTS: The mean bead volume and topotecan dose delivered were 0.086 mL (0.076-0.105 mL) and 1.99 mg/kg (1.51-2.55 mg/kg), respectively. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase were elevated post-embolization but resolved within 2 weeks. One rabbit died two days after TACE with pyloric duodenal perforation observed at necropsy, potentially due to non-target embolization. In vitro elution of topotecan from ROMTOP was complete in 10 h compared to 3 h for irinotecan-loaded microspheres. CONCLUSION: Selective embolization with ROMTOP was tolerated at a dose of 2 mg/kg (24 mg/m2) in rabbits. In vitro topotecan elution from microspheres was more prolonged compared to irinotecan.
Authors: Koorosh Ashrafi; Yiqing Tang; Hugh Britton; Orianne Domenge; Delphine Blino; Andrew J Bushby; Kseniya Shuturminska; Mark den Hartog; Alessandro Radaelli; Ayele H Negussie; Andrew S Mikhail; David L Woods; Venkatesh Krishnasamy; Elliot B Levy; Bradford J Wood; Sean L Willis; Matthew R Dreher; Andrew L Lewis Journal: J Control Release Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Shivaani Kummar; Mark Raffeld; Lamin Juwara; Yvonne Horneffer; Agnes Strassberger; Deborah Allen; Seth M Steinberg; Annamaria Rapisarda; Shawn D Spencer; William D Figg; Xiaohong Chen; Ismail Baris Turkbey; Peter Choyke; Anthony J Murgo; James H Doroshow; Giovanni Melillo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ayele H Negussie; Matthew R Dreher; Carmen Gacchina Johnson; Yiqing Tang; Andrew L Lewis; Gert Storm; Karun V Sharma; Bradford J Wood Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Giammaria Fiorentini; Camillo Aliberti; Massimo Tilli; Luca Mulazzani; Francesco Graziano; Paolo Giordani; Andrea Mambrini; Francesco Montagnani; Paolo Alessandroni; Vincenzo Catalano; Paolo Coschiera Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Richard E J Forster; Sharon A Small; Yiqing Tang; Clare L Heaysman; Andrew W Lloyd; Wendy Macfarlane; Gary J Phillips; Milan D Antonijevic; Andrew L Lewis Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2010-06-19 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: H A Burris; A R Hanauske; R K Johnson; M H Marshall; J G Kuhn; S G Hilsenbeck; D D Von Hoff Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1992-12-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: G J Creemers; J Wanders; T Gamucci; S Vallentin; L Y Dirix; P Schöffski; I Hudson; J Verweij Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: S Guichard; C Terret; I Hennebelle; I Lochon; P Chevreau; E Frétigny; J Selves; E Chatelut; R Bugat; P Canal Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Michal Mauda-Havakuk; Michael T Kassin; Andrew S Mikhail; Juan A Esparza-Trujillo; Ivane Bakhutashvili; David L Woods; Paul G Wakim; Matthew F Starost; John W Karanian; Bradford J Wood; William F Pritchard Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 3.464