Literature DB >> 3280304

If a well-stabilized epileptic patient has a subtherapeutic antiepileptic drug level, should the dose be increased? A randomized prospective study.

E Woo1, Y M Chan, Y L Yu, Y W Chan, C Y Huang.   

Abstract

In an attempt to determine whether the dose of an antiepileptic drug should be increased in epileptic patients who were seizure-free and had subtherapeutic serum levels, 79 patients with idiopathic generalized tonic-clonic seizures treated with monotherapy [phenytoin (PHT) or phenobarbital (PB)] and with a subtherapeutic serum level were prospectively studied. Their last seizure was at least 3 months prior to entry, and no patient had any clinical evidence of toxicity. They were randomized to study arm A (keeping the level in the subtherapeutic range) or study arm B (increasing the dose until the level reached and stayed at the therapeutic range). Over a mean follow-up period of 24 months, there was no significant difference between the two study arms in the occurrence of seizures, but arm B patients had an increased incidence of neurotoxic side effects from the dose increment. These results confirm the clinical impression that it is unnecessary to increase the dose of the antiepileptic drug despite a subtherapeutic serum concentration in a relatively well-stabilized patient, thus minimizing the frequency of dose adjustment and the need for expensive therapeutic drug monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3280304     DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1988.tb04408.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  20 in total

Review 1.  Seizure disorders: Part 2. Treatment.

Authors:  S Kammerman; L Wasserman
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-09

Review 2.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of phenytoin. Rationale and current status.

Authors:  M Levine; T Chang
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Randomized exposure-controlled trials; impact of randomization and analysis strategies.

Authors:  Kristin E Karlsson; Anders Grahnén; Mats O Karlsson; E Niclas Jonsson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Therapeutic drug monitoring and patient outcome. A review of the issues.

Authors:  A L Tonkin; F Bochner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Therapeutic drug monitoring--antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  M J Eadie
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Is there a role for therapeutic drug monitoring of new anticonvulsants?

Authors:  E Perucca
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic variability of newer antiepileptic drugs: when is monitoring needed?

Authors:  Svein I Johannessen; Torbjörn Tomson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Clinical pharmacokinetics in the 21st century. Does the evidence support definitive outcomes?

Authors:  M H Ensom; G A Davis; C D Cropp; R J Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Seizure prophylaxis for brain tumour patients. Brief review and guide for family physicians.

Authors:  C B Agbi; M Bernstein
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Monitoring antiepileptic drugs: a level-headed approach.

Authors:  Erik K St Louis
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.363

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.