Literature DB >> 3280197

Late infections of total joint prostheses. A review and recommendations for prevention.

E G Maderazo1, S Judson, H Pasternak.   

Abstract

The incidence of late infection of total joint prostheses is 0.6%. Because this incidence has increased from 0.08% in 1978, the authors reviewed their experience and the literature in search of pathogenetic and preventative measures. The most common pathogen responsible for late prosthetic joint infections was staphylococcus (54%; both Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis), even when infection was of dental origin. The three most common origins of infection were skin and soft tissue (46%), dental (15%), and urinary (13%). Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen when the source was the urinary tract. Mortality and cost calculations indicate that chemoprophylaxis is justified for dental procedures and probably also for other surgical procedures in organs containing microflora. Prophylaxis must include antistaphylococcal drugs. The first generation cephalosporin antibiotics are recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3280197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  39 in total

1.  The value of (18)FDG-PET for the detection of infected hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Benedicte Vanquickenborne; Alex Maes; Johan Nuyts; Frank Van Acker; Jos Stuyck; Michiel Mulier; Alfons Verbruggen; Luc Mortelmans
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  An infected prosthetic hip. Is there a role for prophylactic antibiotics?

Authors:  J C Mason; C T Dollery; A So; J Cohen; S R Bloom; C Bulpitt; R Russell-Jones; C M Oakley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-01

3.  White blood cell scintigraphy with monoclonal antibodies in the study of the infected endoprosthesis.

Authors:  J Sciuk; C Puskás; B Greitemann; O Schober
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1992

4.  The infected orthopaedic implant. An animal model to study the mechanisms of haematogenous infection of cementless implant materials.

Authors:  H C Vogelyl; W J Dhertl; A Fleer; A J Verboutl
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1996-05

5.  Reducing periprosthetic joint infection: what really counts?

Authors:  Giuseppe Solarino; Antonella Abate; Giovanni Vicenti; Antonio Spinarelli; Andrea Piazzolla; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-01-31

6.  Who decides on the need for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with major arthroplasties requiring dental treatment: is it a joint responsibility?

Authors:  S S Sandhu; J C Lowry; S F Reuben; M E Morton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Are antibiotics necessary in hip arthroplasty with asymptomatic bacteriuria? Seeding risk with/without treatment.

Authors:  José Cordero-Ampuero; Enrique González-Fernández; David Martínez-Vélez; Jaime Esteban
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Incidence and sources of native and prosthetic joint infection: a community based prospective survey.

Authors:  C J Kaandorp; H J Dinant; M A van de Laar; H J Moens; A P Prins; B A Dijkmans
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Ultrasound-guided aspiration in suspected sepsis of resection arthroplasty of the hip joint.

Authors:  K Földes; P Bálint; G Bálint; W W Buchanan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Group C streptococcal septic arthritis of a prosthetic hip joint following dental treatment.

Authors:  Sarah Al-Himdani; David Woodnutt
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.