| Literature DB >> 32801568 |
Pumla Staffa1, Nkululeko Nyangiwe2, George Msalya3, Yakob Petro Nagagi4, Felix Nchu1.
Abstract
AIM: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales) inoculum on plant growth, volatile constituents, and tick repellency of the extracts of Tulbaghia violacea (Amaryllidaceae).Entities:
Keywords: Beauveria bassiana; Tulbaghia violacea; fungal endophyte; secondary metabolites; tick repellency; tick toxicity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32801568 PMCID: PMC7396350 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.1159-1166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Figure-1Fungus-treated potted Tulbaghia violacea group (T) and control-treated potted T. violacea (C).
Figure-2Endophytic colonization of Tulbaghia violacea by Beauveria bassiana; C: Leaf sections from control-treated plants showing no fungal outgrowth, while fungal hyphae outgrowth occurred on root (TR) and leaf (TL) sections of fungus-treated plants.
Figure-3Disk repellency bioassay of Tulbaghia violacea on Rhipicephalus appendiculatus larvae. The Whatman No.1 filter paper was divided into six sections, representing treatments (TR [extracts of roots from plants treated with B. bassiana], TL [extracts of leaves from plants treated with B. bassiana], CR [extracts of roots from plants not exposed to the fungus], CL [extracts of leaves from plants not exposed to the fungus], DEET, and acetone).
The effects of Beauveria bassiana inoculation on different growth parameters (mean±SE) of Tulbaghia violacea at 12 weeks post-treatment.
| Parameters | Treatment | Period | Mean±SE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plant height (cm) | Fungus | Week 12 | 34.1±0.37a |
| Control | Week 12 | 32.1±0.56b | |
| Root length (cm) | Fungus | Week 12 | 25.3±0.54a |
| Control | Week 12 | 23.5±0.63b | |
| Number of leaves per plant | Fungus | Week 12 | 20.7±1.06a |
| Control | Week 12 | 22.7±1.00a | |
| Leaf fresh weight (g plant-1) | Fungus | Week 12 | 17.2±0.64b |
| Control | Week 12 | 20.4±0.54a | |
| Root fresh weight (g plant-1) | Fungus | Week 12 | 24.2±0.84a |
| Control | Week 12 | 23.0±0.97a | |
| Leaf dry weight (g plant-1) | Fungus | Week 12 | 3.1±0.28a |
| Control | Week 12 | 3.3±0.23a | |
| Root dry weight (g plant-1) | Fungus | Week 12 | 3.1± 0.17a |
| Control | Week 12 | 2.9± 0.24a |
Means followed by lowercase letters in the same column are significantly different (p<0.05) for each parameter following comparison using Tukey’s test. Gray and white colors are used to differentiate/separate the growth parameters
Mean area ratio (in relation to internal standard) of volatile compound (mean±SE) of aerial (leaf) and root parts of Tulbaghia violacea following exposure to control and fungus treatments.
| Volatile compounds | Leaves | Roots | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control treatment | Control treatment | |||
| Dimethyl disulfide | 0.5±0.24a | 0.2±0.09a | 1.5±0.18a | 0.6±0.30a |
| Alpha-pinene | 0.1± 0.02a | 0.1± 0.03a | 0.1±0.02 a | - |
| Limonene | 2.4±0.53a | 2.5±0.65a | 1.9±0.65a | 2.3±0.53a |
| Cumene | 0.1±0.00a | 0.1±0.0a | 0.1±0.0a | 0.1±0.15a |
| Gamma-terpinene | 0.5±0.02a | 0.4±0.10a | 0.6 ±0.01a | 0.3±0.11a |
| Styrene | 1.9±0.33a | 1.2±0.37a | 4.6±0.58b | 26±0.77a |
| Octenone | 0.1±0.0a | 0.1±0.00a | 0.4±0.33a | 0.1±0.00a |
| Dimethyl trisulfide | 0.3±0.07a | 0.4±0.26a | 1.3 ±0.3a | 0.9±0.63a |
| Nonanal | 0.29±0.03a | 3.8±1.72b | - | 4.0±1.5a |
| Sec-butyl sultany | 0.2±0.00a | 0.1±0.03b | 0.2±0.01a | 1±0.04a |
| Isodurene | 0.3±0.17a | 0.6±0.39a | 0.2±0.05a | 0.3±0.23a |
| (1,1-dimethylpropyl) benzene | 0.08±0.00a | 0.08±0.03a | 0.1±0.02a | 0.09±0.01a |
| Isodurene (trans) | 1.2±0.09b | 0.8±0.02a | 0.2±0.04b | 0.8±1.62a |
| 4-methyl-indene | 0.3±0.02a | 0.2±0.08a | 0.5±0.01a | 0.3±0.10a |
| 2-2-Sulfanyl ethyl | 0.3±0.04a | 0.2±0.09a | 1.5±0.18a | 0.7±0.30a |
| Alpha-cyclocitral | 0.12±0.03a | - | - | - |
| Methyl (methylthio) methyl | 4.4±1.2a | 1.8±0.90a | 25.1±4.58a | 9.9±6.7 b |
| Trans(+)-carveol | - | 0.3±0.32a | 4.0±1.37a | 1.3±0.70a |
| Naphthalene | 0.9±0.09a | 0.6± 0.1b | 1.7±0.2a | 1.2±0.40b |
| 1,2,4-trithiolane | 0.1±0.02a | 0.2±0.13a | 0.1±0.06a | 0.1± 0.10a |
| Cis-genenaineol | 0.3±0.01a | 0.1±0.03a | 0.2±0.00a | 0.1±0.01a |
| Dimethyl trithiocarbonate | 0.1±0.03a | 0.1±0.03a | - | 0.1±0.03a |
| 4-Propylbenzamide | 0.2±0.16a | 0.1±0.03a | 0.7±0.13a | 0.2±0.05a |
| Tris(methylthio met) | 0.2±0.05a | 0.1±0.03a | 0.7±0.01a | 0.5±0.01a |
| 9,12-octadecadienoic-acid-ethyl-ester | - | - | 0.05 ±0.00a | - |
Means followed by same lowercase letters in the same row are not significantly different (p>0.05) following comparison of fungus and control treatments using Tukey test; roots and leaves were analyzed separately
The mean±SE number of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus larvae that were found on the fungus and control treated sections after 3 min after exposure to varying concentrations of acetone extracts in a disk repellency bioassay.
| Treatments | Mean number of ticks present±SE 20% w/v | Mean number of ticks present±SE 10% w/v | Mean number of ticks present±SE 5% w/v |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test (fungus) leaves (TL) | 21.4±2.0bA | 8.4±2.8abB | 7.8±2.1aB |
| Test (fungus) roots (TR) | 20.4±4.3bA | 5.6±1.9aB | 6.8±2.7aB |
| Control leaves (CL) | 5.0±1.2aA | 9.0±2.6abA | 8.2±2.5aA |
| Control roots (CR) | 9.6±2.0aB | 17.2±4.1bA | 14.2±1.4aB |
| DEET | 6.0±1.9aA | 2.8±1.0 aB | 3.8±1.3 aB |
| Acetone | 9.4±2.1aA | 11.0±2.0 abA | 10.8±2.8 aA |
Means followed with the same lowercase letters on the same column are not significantly different, following Tukey’s test at p>0.05 level of significance. Means followed with the same uppercase letters on the same row are not significantly different, following Tukey’s test at p>0.05 level of significance