| Literature DB >> 32801375 |
Aida Selmanagić1, Muhamed Ajanović2, Alma Kamber-Ćesir2, Lejla Redžepagić-Vražalica3, Azra Jelešković3, Enita Nakaš3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The development of third molars can be helpful in dental age estimation of adolescents and in early adult period. We tested the repeatability and accuracy of the three dental age radiographic methods (Olze, Demirjian and Solari and Abramovitch) and evaluated which method is more useful. We also aimed at testing to find the correlation of estimated dental and chronological age by these three methods.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Age Determination by Teeth; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Third Molar
Year: 2020 PMID: 32801375 PMCID: PMC7362735 DOI: 10.15644/asc54/2/6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Stomatol Croat ISSN: 0001-7019
Distribution of respondents with hypodontia of third molars by age and sex
| GROUP | Sex of respondents | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| 8-10 years | 42 | 16.7% | 42 | 16.7% | 84 | 16.7% | |
| 11-13 years | 41 | 16.3% | 42 | 16.7% | 83 | 16.5% | |
| 14-16 years | 42 | 16.7% | 42 | 16.7% | 84 | 16.7% | |
| 17-19 years | 42 | 16.7% | 42 | 16.7% | 84 | 16.7% | |
| 20-22 years | 42 | 16.7% | 42 | 16.7% | 84 | 16.7% | |
| 23-25 years | 42 | 16.7% | 42 | 16.7% | 84 | 16.7% | |
| Total | 251 | 100.0% | 252 | 100.0% | 503 | 100.0% |
Distribution of respondents with all four third molars presented by age and sex
| GROUP | Sex of respondents | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| 8-10 years | 42 | 16.7% | 42 | 16.7% | 84 | 16.7% | |
| 11-13 years | 42 | 16.7% | 42 | 16.7% | 84 | 16.7% | |
| 14-16 years | 42 | 16.7% | 42 | 16.7% | 84 | 16.7% | |
| 17-19 years | 42 | 16.7% | 42 | 16.7% | 84 | 16.7% | |
| 20-22 years | 42 | 16.7% | 42 | 16.7% | 84 | 16.7% | |
| 23-25 years | 42 | 16.7% | 42 | 16.7% | 84 | 16.7% | |
| Total | 252 | 100.0% | 252 | 100.0% | 504 | 100.0% |
Distribution of average age according sex
| Sex of respondents | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | |||||
| n | Mean | Std. Deviation | n | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
| Chronological age | 503 | 20.02.20 | 01.04.90 | 504 | 20.75 | 01.04.84 |
Distribution of correlation between chronological and estimated dental age according the sex of respondents
| Stage of third molar development | Sex of respondents | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | |||||
| Chronological age | Chronological age | |||||
| Spearman's rho Correlation | p | n | Spearman's rho Correlation | p | n | |
| Olze – Upper jaw, right side | 821 | 0 | 392 | 819 | 0 | 381 |
| Demirjian – Upper jaw, right | 856 | 0 | 392 | 857 | 0 | 380 |
| Solari and Abramovitch – Upper jaw, right | 856 | 0 | 392 | 857 | 0 | 380 |
| Olze – Upper jaw, left side | 827 | 0 | 382 | 797 | 0 | 395 |
| Demirjian – Upper jaw, left | 864 | 0 | 382 | 841 | 0 | 394 |
| Solari and Abramovitch – Upper jaw, left | 864 | 0 | 382 | 841 | 0 | 394 |
| Olze- Lower jaw, right | 858 | 0 | 419 | 845 | 0 | 399 |
| Demirjian – Lower jaw, right | 884 | 0 | 419 | 875 | 0 | 398 |
| Solari and Abramovitch – Lower jaw, right | 884 | 0 | 419 | 875 | 0 | 398 |
| Olze – Lower jaw, left | 848 | 0 | 403 | 847 | 0 | 404 |
| Demirjian – Lower jaw, left | 881 | 0 | 403 | 872 | 0 | 403 |
| Solari and Abramovitch – Lower jaw, left | 881 | 0 | 403 | 872 | 0 | 403 |
Figure 1Graphical representation of correlation between chronological and estimated dental age.