Literature DB >> 32801341

Characterization of TP53-wildtype tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas: rare exceptions to the binary classification of ovarian serous carcinoma.

M Herman Chui1, Amir Momeni Boroujeni2, Diana Mandelker2, Marc Ladanyi2, Robert A Soslow2.   

Abstract

While TP53 mutation is widely considered to be a defining feature of tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), rare TP53-mutation-negative cases have been reported. To gain further insight into this rare subset, a retrospective review was conducted on 25 TP53-wildtype tubo-ovarian HGSCs, constituting 2.5% of 987 HGSCs profiled by the MSK-IMPACT sequencing platform. Consistent with serous differentiation, positive staining for Pax8 and WT1 was present in virtually all TP53-wildtype HGSCs. Other characteristic features of HGSC, such as serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, or genetic alterations of CCNE1 and BRCA1/2 were identified in these tumors, furthering supporting their classification as bona fide HGSC, despite lacking TP53 mutations. Overall, the level of chromosomal instability of TP53-wildtype HGSCs was intermediate between low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) and TP53-mutated HGSC. Morphologic assessment by observers blinded to mutation status revealed a significant subset of tumors with Grade 2 nuclear atypia (which exceeds the degree of atypia allowed for LGSC, but less than typically encountered for HGSC) combined with micropapillary features (6/19, 32%, chemotherapy-naive TP53-wildtype HGSCs compared to 0/21, 0%, TP53-mutated HGSCs; p = 0.007). Some TP53-wildtype HGSCs harbored driver mutations in KRAS (n = 3), BRAF (n = 1) or NRAS (n = 2). Overall, 10 (40%) cases had "LGSC-like" morphology (i.e., Grade 2 nuclear atypia and micropapillary features) and/or RAS/RAF mutation, and most of these showed a wildtype p53 pattern of expression by immunohistochemistry (7/9, 78%). The remaining TP53-wildtype HGSCs (n = 15, 60%) exhibited severe nuclear atypia (Grade 3) and were morphologically indistinguishable from conventional TP53-mutated HGSC. Despite lacking genetic alterations of TP53, these "usual HGSC-like" tumors often showed evidence of p53 dysfunction, including downregulation of expression ('null' or equivocal p53 staining in 9/14, 64%) or MDM2 amplification (n = 2). Our results support the existence of TP53-wildtype HGSCs, which comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors which may arise via distinct pathogenic mechanisms.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32801341     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-00648-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  1 in total

Review 1.  The genetic basis of familial adenomatous polyposis and its implications for clinical practice and risk management.

Authors:  Maria Liz Leoz; Sabela Carballal; Leticia Moreira; Teresa Ocaña; Francesc Balaguer
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2015-04-16
  1 in total
  8 in total

1.  Human iPSC-derived fallopian tube organoids with BRCA1 mutation recapitulate early-stage carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Nur Yucer; Rodney Ahdoot; Michael J Workman; Alexander H Laperle; Maria S Recouvreux; Kathleen Kurowski; Diana J Naboulsi; Victoria Liang; Ying Qu; Jasmine T Plummer; Simon A Gayther; Sandra Orsulic; Beth Y Karlan; Clive N Svendsen
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 9.423

2.  Can TP53 variant negative be high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma? A case series.

Authors:  Lawrence Kasherman; Swati Garg; Nairi Tchrakian; Blaise Clarke; Katherine Karakasis; Raymond H Kim; Tracy L Stockley; Neesha Dhani; Amit M Oza; Stephanie Lheureux
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 3.  Immunohistochemical Biomarkers as a Surrogate of Molecular Analysis in Ovarian Carcinomas: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Giacomo Santandrea; Simonetta Piana; Riccardo Valli; Magda Zanelli; Elisa Gasparini; Antonio De Leo; Vincenzo Dario Mandato; Andrea Palicelli
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-29

4.  Prognostic significance of intra-tumoral budding in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  Toru Hachisuga; Midori Murakami; Hiroshi Harada; Taeko Ueda; Tomoko Kurita; Seiji Kagami; Kiyoshi Yoshino; Ryosuke Tajiri; Masanori Hisaoka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Molecular mechanisms of platinum‑based chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer (Review).

Authors:  Ling Yang; Hong-Jian Xie; Ying-Ying Li; Xia Wang; Xing-Xin Liu; Jia Mai
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 6.  The Many Faces of Serous Neoplasms and Related Lesions of the Female Pelvis: A Review.

Authors:  Sameera Rashid; Maria A Arafah; Mohammed Akhtar
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 7.  The Potential Use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Derived Exosomes for Orthopedic Diseases Treatment.

Authors:  Kosar Malekpour; Ali Hazrati; Marziah Zahar; Alexander Markov; Angelina Olegovna Zekiy; Jamshid Gholizadeh Navashenaq; Leila Roshangar; Majid Ahmadi
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 6.692

8.  Somatic intronic TP53 c.375+5G mutations are a recurrent but under-recognized mode of TP53 inactivation.

Authors:  M Herman Chui; Ciyu Yang; Nikita Mehta; Vikas Rai; Ahmet Zehir; Amir Momeni Boroujeni; Marc Ladanyi; Diana Mandelker
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2021-09-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.