Literature DB >> 32800402

Clinical outcomes of lingual nerve repair.

S Atkins1, E Kyriakidou2.   

Abstract

Lingual nerve injury, a well-described complication of third molar removal, may result in permanent lingual sensory deficit leading to symptoms including lost or altered sensation, inadvertent tongue biting, and the development of unpleasant neuropathic pain, with consequent impaired quality of life. We analysed outcomes of a prospective case series to determine whether direct anastomosis of the lingual nerve results in improved sensory recovery and reduced neuropathic pain, and whether delayed surgery is worthwhile. In 114 patients who underwent nerve repair at our nerve injury clinic following damage sustained during mandibular third molar removal, sensory deficit was assessed before and after surgery using a questionnaire and visual analogue scales (VAS) to assess pain, tingling, and discomfort. Neurosensory tests were utilised to evaluate light touch, pin-prick, and two-point discrimination thresholds. Subjectively, 94% patients felt their sensation had improved following nerve repair, with significant reductions in the incidence of tongue biting (p<0.0001), impaired speech (p<0.0001), and neuropathic pain (p=0.0017). Quantitative neurosensory data showed highly significant improvements in light touch, pin-prick, and two-point discrimination (all p<0.0001), and VAS scores for pain (p=0.0145), tingling (p<0.0025), and discomfort (p<0.0001) were significantly reduced. Patients with high levels of pain preoperatively (VAS>40) showed highly significant reductions in pain (p<0.0001). No correlation was found between surgical outcome and patient's age or delay until surgery. Lingual nerve repair results in good sensory outcomes and significant improvements in the incidence and degree of neuropathic pain, even when delayed.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  case series; delay to surgery; lingual nerve surgery; neuropathic pain; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32800402     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of prognosis in two methods for the lingual nerve repair: direct suture with vein graft cuff and collagen allograft method.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Fujita; Itaru Tojyo; Takashi Nakanishi; Shigeru Suzuki
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-03-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.