Itsuka Arakawa1,2, Kensuke Igarashi3, Yoshiki Imamura4,5, Frauke Müller4, Samir Abou-Ayash1, Martin Schimmel1,4. 1. Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 2. Comprehensive Dental Care, The Nippon Dental University Niigata Hospital, Niigata, Japan. 3. Department of Dental Materials Science, School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, The Nippon Dental University, Niigata, Japan. 4. Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 5. Department of Geriatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Tongue pressure (TP) is used for the diagnosis of oral hypofunction; however, the impact of several variables on TP is unclear. Therefore, the current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyse the variability in tongue pressure among healthy individuals aged ≥60 years vs <60 years. Secondary outcomes were the influence of gender and the type of measuring device (Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) vs JMS tongue pressure measurement device (JMS)). METHODS: PubMed and the Japanese database Ichushi-Web were searched systematically by two independent reviewers for studies reporting TP values in healthy populations. Clinical studies published between 1959 and June 2020 with more than 10 participants, written in English, German or Japanese, were included. A random-effects meta-regression for aggregate-level data was applied (α < 0.05). RESULTS: Sixty-eight studies reported TP for a total of 13 773 subjects aged <60 years (n = 3265) and ≥60 years (n = 10 508). TP was significantly higher in subjects <60 years (estimated weighted mean (EWM) ± standard error = 51.9 ± 1.28 kPa; 95% CI = 49.4-54.4) relative to those ≥60 (EWM = 34.7 ± 0.94 kPa; 95% CI = 32.8-36.5) (P < .001), men (EWM = 45.9 ± 2.09 kPa; 95% CI = 41.8-50.0) relative to women (EWM = 39.3 ± 1.68 kPa; 95% CI = 36.0-42.6) (P = .015) and when assessed with the IOPI (EWM = 51.9 ± 1.32 kPa; 95% CI = 49.3-54.5) compared to the JMS (EWM = 33.5 ± 0.63 kPa; 95% CI = 32.2-34.7) (P < .001). In terms of gender, there was no significant difference in TP among subjects ≥60 years (P = .282). However, in subjects younger than 60, a significant difference was observed (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Healthy populations aged <60 years showed significantly higher TP than those aged ≥60 years. TP values ascertained by the IOPI are significantly higher than those obtained with the JMS.
OBJECTIVES: Tongue pressure (TP) is used for the diagnosis of oral hypofunction; however, the impact of several variables on TP is unclear. Therefore, the current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyse the variability in tongue pressure among healthy individuals aged ≥60 years vs <60 years. Secondary outcomes were the influence of gender and the type of measuring device (Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) vs JMS tongue pressure measurement device (JMS)). METHODS: PubMed and the Japanese database Ichushi-Web were searched systematically by two independent reviewers for studies reporting TP values in healthy populations. Clinical studies published between 1959 and June 2020 with more than 10 participants, written in English, German or Japanese, were included. A random-effects meta-regression for aggregate-level data was applied (α < 0.05). RESULTS: Sixty-eight studies reported TP for a total of 13 773 subjects aged <60 years (n = 3265) and ≥60 years (n = 10 508). TP was significantly higher in subjects <60 years (estimated weighted mean (EWM) ± standard error = 51.9 ± 1.28 kPa; 95% CI = 49.4-54.4) relative to those ≥60 (EWM = 34.7 ± 0.94 kPa; 95% CI = 32.8-36.5) (P < .001), men (EWM = 45.9 ± 2.09 kPa; 95% CI = 41.8-50.0) relative to women (EWM = 39.3 ± 1.68 kPa; 95% CI = 36.0-42.6) (P = .015) and when assessed with the IOPI (EWM = 51.9 ± 1.32 kPa; 95% CI = 49.3-54.5) compared to the JMS (EWM = 33.5 ± 0.63 kPa; 95% CI = 32.2-34.7) (P < .001). In terms of gender, there was no significant difference in TP among subjects ≥60 years (P = .282). However, in subjects younger than 60, a significant difference was observed (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Healthy populations aged <60 years showed significantly higher TP than those aged ≥60 years. TP values ascertained by the IOPI are significantly higher than those obtained with the JMS.
Authors: Laura Rodríguez-Alcalá; Juan Martín-Lagos Martínez; Carlos O Connor-Reina; Guillermo Plaza Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 3.240