Gauri Tadvalkar1, Sonali Pal-Ghosh1, Ahdeah Pajoohesh-Ganji1, Mary Ann Stepp2. 1. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC, 20037, USA. 2. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC, 20037, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC, 20037, USA. Electronic address: mastepp@gwu.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Here we study the impact of using either CO2 gas or cervical dislocation (CD) for euthanasia and using different techniques to enucleate the eye on preserving axonal density and morphology of the intraepithelial corneal nerves (ICNs). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether using CO2 gas or CD for euthanasia and enucleating by cutting or pulling eyes out impacts axon density and nerve terminal morphology in the mouse cornea. METHODS: Mice were euthanized by CO2 gas or CD; the impact of delaying fixation for 5 min post-euthanasia was also assessed. We tested two different techniques to enucleate the eyes: cutting the optic nerve by curved scissors or pulling the eye out. A minimum of 10 corneas from 5 male and female BALB/c mice were used for each variable. Axons and intraepithelial corneal nerve terminals (ICNTs) were visualized utilizing βIII tubulin and L1CAM and quantified using confocal microscopy. RESULTS: The variations seen in axon density between individual mice are not gender- or euthanasia-dependent. A significant reduction in axon density and loss of ICNT morphology are observed in eyes enucleated by pulling the optic nerve out. Similar results are obtained in male and female mice. CONCLUSION: While the variations tested in euthanasia do not affect axon density in male and female mouse corneas, enucleation by proptosing and gently cutting out the eyes yields increased axon density and improved ICNT morphology compared to pulling eyes out and leaving the optic nerve attached.
INTRODUCTION: Here we study the impact of using either CO2 gas or cervical dislocation (CD) for euthanasia and using different techniques to enucleate the eye on preserving axonal density and morphology of the intraepithelial corneal nerves (ICNs). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether using CO2 gas or CD for euthanasia and enucleating by cutting or pulling eyes out impacts axon density and nerve terminal morphology in the mouse cornea. METHODS:Mice were euthanized by CO2 gas or CD; the impact of delaying fixation for 5 min post-euthanasia was also assessed. We tested two different techniques to enucleate the eyes: cutting the optic nerve by curved scissors or pulling the eye out. A minimum of 10 corneas from 5 male and female BALB/c mice were used for each variable. Axons and intraepithelial corneal nerve terminals (ICNTs) were visualized utilizing βIII tubulin and L1CAM and quantified using confocal microscopy. RESULTS: The variations seen in axon density between individual mice are not gender- or euthanasia-dependent. A significant reduction in axon density and loss of ICNT morphology are observed in eyes enucleated by pulling the optic nerve out. Similar results are obtained in male and female mice. CONCLUSION: While the variations tested in euthanasia do not affect axon density in male and female mouse corneas, enucleation by proptosing and gently cutting out the eyes yields increased axon density and improved ICNT morphology compared to pulling eyes out and leaving the optic nerve attached.
Authors: Thorsten Maretzky; Marc Schulte; Andreas Ludwig; Stefan Rose-John; Carl Blobel; Dieter Hartmann; Peter Altevogt; Paul Saftig; Karina Reiss Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: S Mechtersheimer; P Gutwein; N Agmon-Levin; A Stoeck; M Oleszewski; S Riedle; R Postina; F Fahrenholz; M Fogel; V Lemmon; P Altevogt Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2001-11-12 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Mary Ann Stepp; Sonali Pal-Ghosh; Gauri Tadvalkar; Alexa Williams; Stephen C Pflugfelder; Cintia S de Paiva Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Takefumi Yamaguchi; Aslihan Turhan; Deshea L Harris; Kai Hu; Harald Prüss; Ulrich von Andrian; Pedram Hamrah Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ahdeah Pajoohesh-Ganji; Sonali Pal-Ghosh; Gauri Tadvalkar; Briana M Kyne; Daniel R Saban; Mary Ann Stepp Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 5.662