Literature DB >> 3279774

Randomized trial of beta-lactam regimens in febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

E J Anaissie1, V Fainstein, G P Bodey, K Rolston, L Elting, H Kantarjian, F Cabanillas, K B McCredie.   

Abstract

A three-arm prospective randomized trial was designed to compare the efficacies of piperacillin plus vancomycin, ceftazidime plus vancomycin, or all three drugs as initial therapy for fever in neutropenic cancer patients. The objectives were to determine whether a broad-spectrum penicillin was as effective as a broad-spectrum cephalosporin and whether two beta-lactam antibiotics were more effective than one. Four hundred and seventy of the 519 febrile episodes entered in the study could be evaluated for response. Ceftazidime plus vancomycin was significantly more effective than piperacillin plus vancomycin, considering all febrile episodes (79 percent versus 61 percent, p = 0.001), documented infections (79 percent versus 57 percent, p = 0.004), gram-negative infections (88 percent versus 47 percent, p = 0.001), and bacteremias (81 percent versus 51 percent, p = 0.01). The addition of piperacillin to ceftazidime (piperacillin plus ceftazidime and vancomycin versus ceftazidime plus vancomycin) did not improve the response rate and was associated with a significantly higher incidence of skin rash. Vancomycin plus ceftazidime provides adequate antibiotic coverage for initial treatment of fever in neutropenic patients. This combination was equally effective, less expensive, and less toxic than the double beta-lactam combination used in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3279774     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90140-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  8 in total

1.  A randomized study of imipenem compared to cefotaxime plus piperacillin as initial therapy of infections in granulocytopenic patients.

Authors:  A Böhme; G Just-Nübling; L Bergmann; P M Shah; W Stille; D Hoelzer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Imipenem or cefoperazone-sulbactam combined with vancomycin for therapy of presumed or proven infection in neutropenic cancer patients.

Authors:  G Bodey; D Abi-Said; K Rolston; I Raad; E Whimbey
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Infections in neutropenic patients. II: Management.

Authors:  P Engervall; M Björkholm
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of vancomycin therapy.

Authors:  W G Leader; M H Chandler; M Castiglia
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Interventional antimicrobial therapy in febrile neutropenic patients. Study Group of the Paul Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy.

Authors:  H Link; G Maschmeyer; P Meyer; W Hiddemann; W Stille; M Helmerking; D Adam
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.673

6.  Vancomycin is not an essential component of the initial empiric treatment regimen for febrile neutropenic patients receiving ceftazidime: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  R Ramphal; M Bolger; D J Oblon; R J Sherertz; J D Malone; K H Rand; M Gilliom; J W Shands; B S Kramer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams for the initial, empirical, treatment of febrile neutropenia: comparison of beta-lactams.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Dafna Yahav; Assaf Bivas; Abigail Fraser; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-11-10

Review 8.  Ceftazidime for neutropenic fevers: is it still an appropriate choice?

Authors:  Ellen Bethany Napier
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2013-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.