Literature DB >> 3279766

Overview of gastroduodenal mucosal protection.

C J Shorrock1, W D Rees.   

Abstract

The ability of the gastric mucosa to resist autodigestion has been recognized for over 200 years. Since these early observations, several components of gastroduodenal defense against injury from damaging luminal contents have been identified. The first line of defense is the thick layer of mucus gel into which bicarbonate is secreted by the underlying epithelial cells. The "mucus-bicarbonate" barrier sustains a pH gradient between the lumen and cell surface such that epithelial cells are maintained at pH 7 to 8, despite the presence of intraluminal acid. The epithelial cells form a second line of defense; since the pH gradient may be overwhelmed by physiologic concentrations of intraluminal acid, this mechanism may be important in maintaining mucosal integrity. The physical properties of the apical cell membrane and intercellular junctions and the presence of surface-active phospholipids on the membrane may be responsible for preventing hydrogen ions (H+) from diffusing into the mucosa by providing a physical barrier to their movement. Furthermore, epithelial cells are capable of rapid turnover and migration and may breach a defect in the epithelium within hours. The aftermath of mucosal damage may generate a further defense mechanism: a thick layer of mucus containing sloughed epithelial cells together with passive movement of bicarbonate-rich fluid from the damaged mucosa. This may prevent exposure of undamaged cell nests to acid and thus aid re-epithelialization. Finally, mucosal blood flow plays a vital role in maintaining epithelial integrity. Studies have shown that increasing or decreasing mucosal blood flow will, respectively, reduce or enhance susceptibility to damage. Although the precise physiologic control mechanisms for mucosal protection have not been defined, there is evidence that local endogenous prostaglandin metabolism may play an important role [4]. The release of neurotransmitters and hormones may also contribute to or modulate the defense mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3279766     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90251-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of effects of ethyl alcohol and bismuth subsalicylate on gastric mucosal barrier in man.

Authors:  R M Dy; J Lof; J K DiBaise; E M Quigley
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Loss of downregulated in adenoma (DRA) impairs mucosal HCO3(-) secretion in murine ileocolonic inflammation.

Authors:  Fang Xiao; Marina Juric; Junhua Li; Brigitte Riederer; Sunil Yeruva; Anurag Kumar Singh; Lifei Zheng; Silke Glage; George Kollias; Pradeep Dudeja; De-An Tian; Gang Xu; Jinxia Zhu; Oliver Bachmann; Ursula Seidler
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 5.325

3.  Complement activation within the coeliac small intestine is localised to Brunner's glands.

Authors:  R B Gallagher; C P Kelly; S Neville; O Sheils; D G Weir; C F Feighery
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Improving the gastrointestinal safety of NSAIDs: the development of misoprostol--from hypothesis to clinical practice.

Authors:  F E Silverstein
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Histamine H2-receptor antagonists stimulate proliferation but not migration of human gastric mucosal cells in vitro.

Authors:  C Ciacci; R Zarrilli; V Ricci; A De Luca; G Mazzacca; C Del Vecchio Blanco; M Romano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Structural elucidation and molecular docking of ferulic acid from Parthenium hysterophorus possessing COX-2 inhibition activity.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Vikas Pruthi
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Pretreatment with Lactobacillus reuteri F-9-35 attenuates ethanol-induced gastric injury in rats.

Authors:  Mao-Cheng Sun; Ping-Ping Hou; Xin-Yu Wang; Chang-Hui Zhao; Bi-Jun Cheng; Yan-Ling Wang; Hong-Wei Hao; Tie-Hua Zhang; Hai-Qing Ye
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.