Literature DB >> 32796418

Muscle Cramping in the Marathon: Dehydration and Electrolyte Depletion vs. Muscle Damage.

Ignacio Martínez-Navarro1,2, Antonio Montoya-Vieco1,2, Eladio Collado3, Barbara Hernando4, Nayara Panizo4,5, Carlos Hernando6,7.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Martínez-Navarro, I, Montoya-Vieco, A, Collado, E, Hernando, B, Panizo, N, and Hernando, C. Muscle Cramping in the marathon: Dehydration and electrolyte depletion vs. muscle damage. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1629-1635, 2022-Our aim was to compare dehydration variables, serum electrolytes, and muscle damage serum markers between runners who suffered exercise-associated muscle cramps (EAMC) and runners who did not suffer EAMC in a road marathon. We were also interested in analyzing race pacing and training background. Nighty-eight marathoners took part in the study. Subjects were subjected to a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Before and after the race, blood and urine samples were collected and body mass (BM) was measured. Immediately after the race EAMC were diagnosed. Eighty-eight runners finished the marathon, and 20 of them developed EAMC (24%) during or immediately after the race. Body mass change, post-race urine specific gravity, and serum sodium and potassium concentrations were not different between crampers and noncrampers. Conversely, runners who suffered EAMC exhibited significantly greater post-race creatine kinase (464.17 ± 220.47 vs. 383.04 ± 253.41 UI/L, p = 0.034) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (362.27 ± 72.10 vs. 307.87 ± 52.42 UI/L, p = 0.002). Twenty-four hours post-race also values of both biomarkers were higher among crampers (CK: 2,438.59 ± 2,625.24 vs. 1,166.66 ± 910.71 UI/L, p = 0.014; LDH: 277.05 ± 89.74 vs. 227.07 ± 37.15 UI/L, p = 0.021). The difference in the percentage of runners who included strength conditioning in their race training approached statistical significance (EAMC: 25%, non-EAMC: 47.6%; p = 0.074). Eventually, relative speed between crampers and noncrampers only differed from the 25th km onward (p < 0.05). Therefore, runners who suffered EAMC did not exhibit a greater degree of dehydration and electrolyte depletion after the marathon but displayed significantly higher concentrations of muscle damage biomarkers.
Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32796418     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Renal Function Recovery Strategies Following Marathon in Amateur Runners.

Authors:  Carlos Hernando; Carla Hernando; Nayara Panizo; Eladio Collado-Boira; Ana Folch-Ayora; Ignacio Martínez-Navarro; Barbara Hernando
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Relationship Between Muscle Cramps and Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Huiqing Hu; Chuan Wang; Kai Liang; Qin He; Jia Song; Xinghong Guo; Xinguo Hou; Li Chen; Fei Yan
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.168

3.  An Evidence-Based Review of the Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Prevention of Exercise Associated Muscle Cramps.

Authors:  Kevin C Miller; Brendon P McDermott; Susan W Yeargin; Aidan Fiol; Martin P Schwellnus
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Effects of Sodium Intake on Health and Performance in Endurance and Ultra-Endurance Sports.

Authors:  Eleftherios Veniamakis; Georgios Kaplanis; Panagiotis Voulgaris; Pantelis T Nikolaidis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.