Nick Marsidi1, Kristin Boteva1,2, Sofieke A M Vermeulen1, Marloes S van Kester1,3, Roel E Genders1,4. 1. Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands. 2. Medical Faculty Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria. 3. Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Dermatology, Roosevelt Clinic, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tie-over dressings are frequently used for skin grafts. Although a dressing is necessary for split-thickness skin grafts, their use in full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) is questionable. OBJECTIVE: This review was conducted to investigate the influence of different tie overs and dressings on graft take for FTSGs in cutaneous surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic database search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library. The following search terms and comparable were used: skin transplantation, tie-over, fixation, sutures, and take. RESULTS: Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies describe no use of a tie-over dressing for FTSGs. Dressing types included antibacterial dressings, foam or sponges, and bolsters. The lowest graft take was 80% (with a tie-over dressing). The highest graft take was 100% (with and without a tie-over dressing). CONCLUSION: The results show that, regardless of the technique used, the overall graft success rate is high. Although a definite recommendation could not be made, it seems that a graft without a tie-over dressing can suffice in certain circumstances.
BACKGROUND: Tie-over dressings are frequently used for skin grafts. Although a dressing is necessary for split-thickness skin grafts, their use in full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) is questionable. OBJECTIVE: This review was conducted to investigate the influence of different tie overs and dressings on graft take for FTSGs in cutaneous surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic database search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library. The following search terms and comparable were used: skin transplantation, tie-over, fixation, sutures, and take. RESULTS: Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies describe no use of a tie-over dressing for FTSGs. Dressing types included antibacterial dressings, foam or sponges, and bolsters. The lowest graft take was 80% (with a tie-over dressing). The highest graft take was 100% (with and without a tie-over dressing). CONCLUSION: The results show that, regardless of the technique used, the overall graft success rate is high. Although a definite recommendation could not be made, it seems that a graft without a tie-over dressing can suffice in certain circumstances.