PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a neuromuscular disorder, which is caused by incomplete repression of the transcription factor double homeobox 4 (DUX4) in skeletal muscle. To date, there is no DUX4-targeting treatment to prevent or delay disease progression. In the present review, we summarize developments in therapeutic strategies with the focus on inhibiting DUX4 and DUX4 target gene expression. RECENT FINDINGS: Different studies show that DUX4 and its target genes can be repressed with genetic therapies using diverse strategies. Additionally, different small compounds can reduce DUX4 and its target genes in vitro and in vivo. SUMMARY: Most studies that show DUX4 repression by genetic therapies have only been tested in vitro. More efforts should be made to test them in vivo for clinical translation. Several compounds have been shown to prevent DUX4 and target gene expression in vitro and in vivo. However, their efficiency and specificity has not yet been shown. With emerging clinical trials, the clinical benefit from DUX4 repression in FSHD will likely soon become apparent.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a neuromuscular disorder, which is caused by incomplete repression of the transcription factor double homeobox 4 (DUX4) in skeletal muscle. To date, there is no DUX4-targeting treatment to prevent or delay disease progression. In the present review, we summarize developments in therapeutic strategies with the focus on inhibiting DUX4 and DUX4 target gene expression. RECENT FINDINGS: Different studies show that DUX4 and its target genes can be repressed with genetic therapies using diverse strategies. Additionally, different small compounds can reduce DUX4 and its target genes in vitro and in vivo. SUMMARY: Most studies that show DUX4 repression by genetic therapies have only been tested in vitro. More efforts should be made to test them in vivo for clinical translation. Several compounds have been shown to prevent DUX4 and target gene expression in vitro and in vivo. However, their efficiency and specificity has not yet been shown. With emerging clinical trials, the clinical benefit from DUX4 repression in FSHD will likely soon become apparent.
Authors: Jong-Won Lim; Lauren Snider; Zizhen Yao; Rabi Tawil; Silvère M Van Der Maarel; Frank Rigo; C Frank Bennett; Galina N Filippova; Stephen J Tapscott Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Nicoline Voet; Gijs Bleijenberg; Jan Hendriks; Imelda de Groot; George Padberg; Baziel van Engelen; Alexander Geurts Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-10-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Chao-Jen Wong; Leo H Wang; Seth D Friedman; Dennis Shaw; Amy E Campbell; Chris B Budech; Leann M Lewis; Richard J F L Lemmers; Jeffrey M Statland; Silvère M van der Maarel; Rabi N Tawil; Stephen J Tapscott Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Amy E Campbell; Jonathan Oliva; Matthew P Yates; Jun Wen Zhong; Sean C Shadle; Lauren Snider; Nikita Singh; Shannon Tai; Yosuke Hiramuki; Rabi Tawil; Silvère M van der Maarel; Stephen J Tapscott; Francis M Sverdrup Journal: Skelet Muscle Date: 2017-09-04 Impact factor: 4.912
Authors: Darko Bosnakovski; Meiricris T da Silva; Sithara T Sunny; Elizabeth T Ener; Erik A Toso; Ce Yuan; Ziyou Cui; Michael A Walters; Ajit Jadhav; Michael Kyba Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2019-09-11 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Jennifer Cj Chen; Oliver D King; Yuanfan Zhang; Nicholas P Clayton; Carrie Spencer; Bruce M Wentworth; Charles P Emerson; Kathryn R Wagner Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Karlien Mul; Tatiana Hamadeh; Corinne G C Horlings; Rabi Tawil; Jeffrey M Statland; Sabrina Sacconi; Alastair J Corbett; Nicol C Voermans; Catharina G Faber; Baziel G M van Engelen; Ingemar S J Merkies Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2021-05-02 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Anna M Blokhuis; Johanna C W Deenen; Nicol C Voermans; Baziel G M van Engelen; Wietske Kievit; Jan T Groothuis Journal: J Neurol Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 4.849