Literature DB >> 32795506

Demonstrating the consequences of learning missingness patterns in early warning systems for preventative health care: A novel simulation and solution.

Christopher E Gillies1, Daniel F Taylor2, Brandon C Cummings2, Sardar Ansari2, Fadi Islim3, Steven L Kronick2, Richard P Medlin2, Kevin R Ward4.   

Abstract

When using tree-based methods to develop predictive analytics and early warning systems for preventive healthcare, it is important to use an appropriate imputation method to prevent learning the missingness pattern. To demonstrate this, we developed a novel simulation that generated synthetic electronic health record data using a variational autoencoder with a custom loss function, which took into account the high missing rate of electronic health data. We showed that when tree-based methods learn missingness patterns (correlated with adverse events) in electronic health record data, this leads to decreased performance if the system is used in a new setting that has different missingness patterns. Performance is worst in this scenario when the missing rate between those with and without an adverse event is the greatest. We found that randomized and Bayesian regression imputation methods mitigate the issue of learning the missingness pattern for tree-based methods. We used this information to build a novel early warning system for predicting patient deterioration in general wards and telemetry units: PICTURE (Predicting Intensive Care Transfers and other UnfoReseen Events). To develop, tune, and test PICTURE, we used labs and vital signs from electronic health records of adult patients over four years (n = 133,089 encounters). We analyzed primary outcomes of unplanned intensive care unit transfer, emergency vasoactive medication administration, cardiac arrest, and death. We compared PICTURE with existing early warning systems and logistic regression at multiple levels of granularity. When analyzing PICTURE on the testing set using all observations within a hospital encounter (event rate = 3.4%), PICTURE had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.83 and an adjusted (event rate = 4%) area under the precision-recall curve (AUPR) of 0.27, while the next best tested method-regularized logistic regression-had an AUROC of 0.80 and an adjusted AUPR of 0.22. To ensure system interpretability, we applied a state-of-the-art prediction explainer that provided a ranked list of features contributing most to the prediction. Though it is currently difficult to compare machine learning-based early warning systems, a rudimentary comparison with published scores demonstrated that PICTURE is on par with state-of-the-art machine learning systems. To facilitate more robust comparisons and development of early warning systems in the future, we have released our variational autoencoder's code and weights so researchers can (a) test their models on data similar to our institution and (b) make their own synthetic datasets.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early warning systems; Machine learning; Patient deterioration; Simulation; Tree-based methods; Variational autoencoder

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32795506     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  1 in total

1.  Predicting Intensive Care Transfers and Other Unforeseen Events: Analytic Model Validation Study and Comparison to Existing Methods.

Authors:  Brandon C Cummings; Sardar Ansari; Jonathan R Motyka; Guan Wang; Richard P Medlin; Steven L Kronick; Karandeep Singh; Pauline K Park; Lena M Napolitano; Robert P Dickson; Michael R Mathis; Michael W Sjoding; Andrew J Admon; Ross Blank; Jakob I McSparron; Kevin R Ward; Christopher E Gillies
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-04-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.