Literature DB >> 3279501

Comparative activity of the 4-quinolones.

I Phillips1, A King.   

Abstract

Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the 4-quinolones ciprofloxacin, enoxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, difloxacin, A-56620, and CI-934 are consistent world-wide, with allowances for differences in acquired resistance. MICs of these drugs for Enterobacteriaceae correlate with those of nalidixic acid, but resistance to the quinolones is rare if a breakpoint of greater than 2 mg/L is accepted. Most intestinal pathogens are sensitive. Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and other Pseudomonas species except Pseudomonas maltophilia are usually sensitive. Ciprofloxacin is generally the most active of the 4-quinolones against these organisms. All of the new agents have antistaphylococcal activity, but that of norfloxacin and ofloxacin is borderline. Against streptococci, including enterococci and pneumococci, the drugs' activity is moderate or poor. Haemophilus influenzae and Branhamella catarrhalis are very sensitive. Gonococci and meningococci are also highly sensitive to the new agents, but activity against Chlamydia trachomatis and the mycoplasmas is borderline. The organisms associated with nonspecific vaginal infection are not very sensitive. Anaerobes except Bacteroides ureolyticus and Clostridium perfringens are mostly resistant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3279501     DOI: 10.1093/clinids/10.supplement_1.s70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Infect Dis        ISSN: 0162-0886


  8 in total

1.  STD management by private pharmacies in Hanoi: practice and knowledge of drug sellers.

Authors:  J Chalker; N T Chuc; T Falkenberg; N T Do; G Tomson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  In vivo bactericidal activities of ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin in an experimental model of Serratia marcescens endocarditis.

Authors:  M E Juvin; G Potel; J Caillon; Y Q Xiong; D Bugnon; P Le Conte; D I Baron; H B Drugeon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Association experiments with aerobic and anaerobic pathogens: a model of in-vitro susceptibility testing in mixed infections. Activity of enoxacin, clindamycin, and metronidazole.

Authors:  W R Heizmann; R Schmid; F Heilmann; H Werner
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Wound infection caused by Branhamella catarrhalis.

Authors:  L D Gray; R E Van Scoy; J P Anhalt; P K Yu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Correlation between in vitro and in vivo activity of antimicrobial agents against gram-negative bacilli in a murine infection model.

Authors:  B Fantin; J Leggett; S Ebert; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Comparative in vitro activities of several new fluoroquinolones and beta-lactam antimicrobial agents against community isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  T Mazzulli; A E Simor; R Jaeger; S Fuller; D E Low
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Epidemiology of quinolone resistance: Europe and North and South America.

Authors:  F W Goldstein; J F Acar
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Effect of inflammation on intraocular penetration of intravenous ofloxacin in albino rabbits.

Authors:  G Gatti; G Panozzo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.