| Literature DB >> 32794655 |
Yanyan Kong1,2, Chencheng Zhang1, Kawai Liu3, Aparna Wagle Shukla4, Bomin Sun1, Yihui Guan2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: 18 F-FP-CIT and 123 I-FP-CIT are widely used radiotracers in molecular imaging for Parkinson's disease (PD) diagnosis. Compared with 123 I-FP-CIT, 18 F-FP-CIT has superior tracer kinetics. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of using 18 F-FP-CIT positron emission tomography (PET) and 123 I-FP-CIT single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) of dopamine transporters in patients with PD in order to provide evidence for clinical decision-making.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32794655 PMCID: PMC7480930 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol ISSN: 2328-9503 Impact factor: 4.511
Figure 1Search results and flow chart for the inclusion of studies in the meta‐analysis.
Characteristics of the included studies.
| Study | PD (n) | HC (n) | PD age (years) | HC age (years) | PD sex (M/F) | HC sex (M/F) | Disease duration (years) | Tracer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wang 2003 | 31 | 4 | 57 ± 8 | 59 ± 8 | – | – | – | 18F‐FP‐CIT |
| Wang 2006 | 41 | 12 | 58 ± 8 | 59 ± 7 | – | – | 4.3 ± 3.4 | 18F‐FP‐CIT |
| Song 2013 | 24 | 18 | 70 ± 8 | 70 ± 10 | 18/6 | 11/7 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 18F‐FP‐CIT |
| Kim 2015 | 56 | 71 | 61 ± 12 | 60 ± 10 | 31/25 | 39/32 | 2.7 ± 2.8 | 18F‐FP‐CIT |
| Sung 2017 | 35 | 9 | 55 ± 12 | 70 ± 8 | 14/21 | 7/2 | 2.5 ± 2.8 | 18F‐FP‐CIT |
| Yang 2017 | 592 | 10 | 70 ± 6 | 70 ± 8 | 40/502 | 2/8 | 6.0 ± 4.7 | 18F‐FP‐CIT |
| Tissingh 1998 | 21 | 14 | 56 ± 10 | 54 ± 15 | 15/6 | 7/7 | 2.3 ± 1.3 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Booij 1999 | 19 | 10 | 57 | 53 | 18/1 | 1/9 | – | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Booij 2001 | 32 | 36 | 53 ± 11 | 53 ± 18 | 24/8 | 16/20 | 2.0 ± 1.3 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Ceravolo 2004 | 20 | 8 | 67 ± 8 | 66 ± 9 | 13/7 | 5/3 | 4.3 ± 1.9 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| O’Brien 2004 | 38 | 33 | 76 ± 5 | 75 ± 6 | 28/10 | 17/16 | 5.3 ± 7.3 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Tsuchida 2004 | 6 | 10 | 58 ± 12 | 36 ± 16 | 4/2 | 6/4 | 8.0 ± 4.7 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| van Laere 2004 | 39 | 10 | 62 ± 11 | 60 ± 16 | 23/16 | 6/4 | 2.1 ± 1.3 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Varrone 2004 | 9 | 6 | 44 ± 3 | 51 ± 13 | 4/5 | 5/1 | – | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Colloby 2005 | 20 | 22 | 74 ± 5 | 72 ± 4 | 14/6 | 13/9 | 4.5 ± 4.6 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Filippi 2005 | 29 | 18 | 61 ± 11 | 62 ± 8 | 16/13 | 9/9 | 2.2 ± 1.5 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Filippi 2006 | 21 | 20 | 64 ± 8 | 64 ± 7 | 12/9 | 9/11 | 2.7 ± 1.9 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Canesi 2007 | 38 | 14 | 66 ± 8 | – | 25/13 | – | 9.6 ± 4.0 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Isaias 2007 | 20 | 31 | 60 ± 11 | – | 11/9 | – | 1.5 ± 1.0 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Isaias 2008 | 47 | 31 | 62 ± 10 | 64 ± 10 | 28/19 | 13/18 | 3.0 ± 1.0 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Varrone 2008 | 24 | 6 | 46 ± 10 | 51 ± 13 | 16/8 | 5/1 | – | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Isaias 2010 | 13 | 23 | 63 ± 9 | 71 ± 9 | 7/6 | 10/13 | 5.0 ± 2.8 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Kim 2010 | 14 | 12 | 67 ± 4 | 63 ± 6 | 11/3 | 8/4 | – | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Cilia 2011 | 37 | 32 | 70 ± 5 | 70 ± 6 | 18/19 | 15/17 | 4.4 ± 2.9 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Djaldetti 2011 | 15 | 11 | 68 ± 9 | 61 ± 12 | 7/8 | – | 20.6 ± 6.3 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Isaias 2011 | 11 | 10 | 52 | 52 | 5/6 | 3/7 | – | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Di Giuda 2012 | 21 | 17 | 60 ± 13 | 55 ± 14 | 14/7 | 7/10 | 4.0 ± 2.1 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Siepel 2014 | 339 | 158 | 61 ± 10 | 60 ± 11 | 219/120 | 98/60 | – | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Roussakis 2016 | 28 | 12 | 69 ± 5 | 61 ± 9 | 19/9 | 7/5 | 9.8 ± 5.0 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Jakobson 2018 | 22 | 28 | 69 ± 8 | 70 ± 4 | – | – | 1.1 ± 0.8 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Nicastro 2019 | 280 | 208 | 70 ± 11 | 70 ± 11 | 148/132 | 83/125 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Pilotto 2019 | 56 | 54 | 65 ± 10 | 61 ± 13 | 40/16 | 35/19 | 2.2 ± 2.1 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
| Wilson 2019 | 25 | 25 | 54 ± 8 | 46 ± 8 | 11/14 | 10/15 | 9.6 ± 3.9 | 123I‐FP‐CIT |
Values are means ± standard deviation or n.
PD, Parkinson’s disease; HC, healthy controls; M, male; F, female.
Figure 2Forest plot for 18F‐FP‐CIT PET studies assessing the decrease in SUVR in the caudate.
Figure 3Forest plot for 18F‐FP‐CIT PET studies assessing the decrease in SUVR in the anterior putamen.
Figure 4Forest plot for 18F‐FP‐CIT PET studies assessing the decrease in SUVR in the posterior putamen.
Figure 5Forest plot for 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT studies assessing the decrease in SUVR in the caudate.
Figure 6Forest plot for 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT studies assessing the decrease in SUVR in the putamen. Std., standard; CI, confidence interval; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio.