Literature DB >> 32794584

Peri-procedural novel oral anticoagulants dosing strategy during atrial fibrillation ablation: A meta-analysis.

Yin-Jun Mao1, Hang Wang1, Pin-Fang Huang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed at determining whether uninterrupted novel oral anticoagulant (UI-NOAC) would have similar rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events as minimally interrupted NOAC (MI-NOAC) at the time of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) as relevant studies are scarce.
METHODS: We searched through the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for prospective observational studies (POSs) or randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing UI-NOAC versus MI-NOAC from their establishment to January 2020. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the pooled treatment effect.
RESULTS: Nine studies (three POSs and six RCTs) with 2578 patients were included in the final analysis (55% patients received MI-NOAC). No significant difference was found regarding the risk of major bleeding (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.43-2.00, P = .84, I2   = 0%). Both groups were comparable in all subgroups ([Asians: OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.43-2.36, P = .99, I2   = 0%], [non-Asians: OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.11-3.88, P = .63, I2   = 0%], [RCTs: OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.37-1.97, P = .71, I2   = 0%], and [POSs: OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.19-12.01, P = .69, I2   = 0%]). The risk of minor bleeding (P = .88) or stroke (P = .69) was comparable between the groups. UI-NOAC resulted in a significant reduction in silent stroke (SS) (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.83, P = .01, I2   = 72%). No significant difference was found in SS between once-daily and twice-daily NOACs (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.63-1.33, P = .64, I2   = 0%) in the MI-NOAC group.
CONCLUSIONS: UI-NOAC, as a peri-procedural anticoagulation strategy for catheter ablation in AF, had similar safety compared with MI-NOAC, but was advantageous in terms of SS.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; bleeding; catheter ablation; novel oral anticoagulant; peri-procedural anticoagulation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32794584     DOI: 10.1111/pace.14040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  4 in total

Review 1.  Interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy for catheter ablation in adults with arrhythmias.

Authors:  Ghada A Bawazeer; Hadeel A Alkofide; Aya A Alsharafi; Nada O Babakr; Arwa M Altorkistani; Tarek S Kashour; Michael Miligkos; Khalid M AlFaleh; Lubna A Al-Ansary
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-21

2.  Outcomes of uninterrupted vs interrupted Periprocedural direct oral Anticoagulants in atrial Fibrillation ablation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Indranill Basu-Ray; Dibbendhu Khanra; Péter Kupó; Jared Bunch; Sue A Theus; Anindya Mukherjee; Sumit K Shah; András Komócsi; Adedayo Adeboye; John Jefferies
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-01-29

Review 3.  Optimal Anticoagulant Strategy for Periprocedural Management of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tabito Kino; Minako Kagimoto; Takayuki Yamada; Satoshi Ishii; Masanari Asai; Shunichi Asano; Hideto Yano; Toshiyuki Ishikawa; Tomoaki Ishigami
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Meta-analysis of controlled studies on minimally interrupted vs. continuous use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Stijn P G van Vugt; Sjoerd W Westra; Rick H J A Volleberg; Gerjon Hannink; Rena Nakamura; Carlo de Asmundis; Gian-Battista Chierchia; Eliano P Navarese; Marc A Brouwer
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.214

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.