Literature DB >> 32794046

Outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy in challenging achalasia patients: a long-term follow-up study.

Shanshan Xu1, Ningli Chai1, Xiaowei Tang1, Enqiang Linghu2, Longsong Li1, Shasha Wang1, Xiaobin Zhang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been shown to be effective for achalasia patients. Our study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of POEM for challenging patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 278 challenging achalasia patients who underwent POEM from January 2011 to July 2019. The outcomes of POEM such as procedure time, adverse events, and risk factors of adverse events were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the 278 patients (134 males and 144 females) with a mean age of 47.0 years, 103, 223, 93, and 98 patients had prior treatment and were Ling classification IIc/III, submucosal fibrosis (SMF) classification 2/3, and esophageal mucosa in achalasia (EMIA) classification c/d/e/f, respectively. The mean procedure time was 45.9 min (range, 15-158 min). The mean length of the tunnel and myotomy were 10.1 cm (range, 7-17 cm) and 6.6 cm (range, 5-13 cm), respectively. The major adverse event rate was 14.1%, while the minor adverse event rate was 4.7%. SMF classification 2/3 was an independent risk factor for incomplete tunneling, adverse events, and procedure time ≥ 90 min. The mean follow-up time was 37.2 months (range 1-99 months). The mean Eckardt score and esophageal sphincter pressure were both significantly declined postoperatively. The clinical success rate was 95.6%.
CONCLUSION: POEM is safe and effective for challenging achalasia patients. SMF classification grade 2/3 was shown to be an independent risk factor for incomplete tunneling, adverse events, and procedure time ≥ 90 min. For these patients, POEM should be performed by experienced endoscopists, some cases are better served with traditional surgery, such as minimally invasive Heller with Dor fundoplication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMIA classification; Ling classification; Peroral endoscopic myotomy; Prior treatment; SMF classification

Year:  2020        PMID: 32794046     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07864-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  1 in total

1.  [Comparison of peroral endoscopic myotomy with transverse entry incision versus longitudinal entry incision for achalasia].

Authors:  Yaqi Zhai; Enqiang Linghu; Huikai Li; Zhichu Qin; Xiangdong Wang; Hong Du; Jiangyun Meng
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2013-09
  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Modified Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Technique for Type II Achalasia: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Huahui Zhang; Kuangjing Wang; Ying Fang; Zhe Xiong; Min Lin; Lifeng Jiang; Qiuya Niu; Jin Huang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.260

2.  Safety and Efficacy of the Supine Position with the Right Shoulder Raised versus the Left Lateral Position in Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia: A Large-Sample Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Nanjun Wang; Ningli Chai; Longsong Li; Yawei Bi; Shengzhen Liu; Wengang Zhang; Shasha Wang; Enqiang Linghu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 1.919

3.  Safety and efficacy of biodegradable stents in octogenarian patients with esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Oscar Hernandez-Mondragon; Luis Garcia Contreras; Omar Michel Pineda; Geraro Blanco-Velasco; Enrique Murcio-Pérez
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.