Literature DB >> 32793803

Microsphere-Based Osteochondral Scaffolds Carrying Opposing Gradients Of Decellularized Cartilage And Demineralized Bone Matrix.

Vineet Gupta1, Dina V Lyne2, Amy D Laflin2, Taylor A Zabel3, Marilyn Barragan3, Joshua T Bunch4, Donna M Pacicca5,6, Michael S Detamore1,2.   

Abstract

Extracellular matrix (ECM) "raw materials" such as demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and cartilage matrix have emerged as leading scaffolding materials for osteochondral regeneration owing to their capacity to facilitate progenitor/resident cell recruitment, infiltration, and differentiation without adding growth factors. Scaffolds comprising synthetic polymers are sturdy yet generally lack cues for guiding cell differentiation. We hypothesized that opposing gradients of decellularized cartilage (DCC) and DBM in polymeric microsphere-based scaffolds would provide superior regeneration compared to polymer-only scaffolds in vivo. Poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microsphere-based scaffolds were fabricated, either with opposing gradients of DCC and DBM encapsulated (GRADIENT) or without DCC and DBM (BLANK control), and implanted into rabbit osteochondral defects in medial femoral condyles. After 12 weeks, gross morphological evaluation showed that the repair tissue in about 30% of the implants was either slightly or significantly depressed, hinting toward rapid polymer degradation in scaffolds from both of the groups. Additionally, no differences were observed in gross morphology of the repair tissue between the BLANK and GRADIENT groups. Mechanical testing revealed no significant differences in model parameter values between the two groups. Histological observations demonstrated that the repair tissue in both of the groups was fibrous in nature with the cells demonstrating notable proliferation and matrix deposition activity. No adverse inflammatory response was observed in any of the implants from the two groups. Overall, the results emphasize the need to improve the technology in terms of altering the DBM and DCC concentrations, and tailoring the polymer degradation to these concentrations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decellularized cartilage; demineralized bone matrix; gradient scaffolds; microsphere-based scaffolds; osteochondral regeneration

Year:  2016        PMID: 32793803      PMCID: PMC7423242          DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng        ISSN: 2373-9878


  51 in total

1.  FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics.

Authors:  Steve A Maas; Benjamin J Ellis; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Osteochondral interface tissue engineering using macroscopic gradients of bioactive signals.

Authors:  Nathan H Dormer; Milind Singh; Limin Wang; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: Structure and function.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak; Donald O Freytes; Thomas W Gilbert
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Bioactive Microsphere-Based Scaffolds Containing Decellularized Cartilage.

Authors:  Amanda J Sutherland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.979

Review 5.  Extracellular matrix scaffolds for cartilage and bone regeneration.

Authors:  Kim E M Benders; P René van Weeren; Stephen F Badylak; Daniël B F Saris; Wouter J A Dhert; Jos Malda
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 19.536

6.  Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage--II. A numerical algorithm and an experimental study.

Authors:  V C Mow; M C Gibbs; W M Lai; W B Zhu; K A Athanasiou
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Microsphere-based gradient implants for osteochondral regeneration: a long-term study in sheep.

Authors:  Neethu Mohan; Vineet Gupta; Banu Priya Sridharan; Adam J Mellott; Jeremiah T Easley; Ross H Palmer; Richard A Galbraith; Vincent H Key; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 8.  Bioinspired scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration.

Authors:  Silvia Lopa; Henning Madry
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation via a collagen membrane in equine articular defects: results at 12 and 18 months.

Authors:  D D Frisbie; S M Bowman; H A Colhoun; E F DiCarlo; C E Kawcak; C W McIlwraith
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Comparison of single-phase isotropic elastic and fibril-reinforced poroelastic models for indentation of rabbit articular cartilage.

Authors:  Petro Julkunen; Terhi Harjula; Juho Marjanen; Heikki J Helminen; Jukka S Jurvelin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.