| Literature DB >> 32793515 |
Fengyun Liu1,2, Chao Fan3,4, Liangzhi Zhang3, Yuan Li1,2, Haiwen Hou1,2, Yan Ma1,2, Jinhua Fan1,2, Yueqin Tan1,2, Tianyi Wu1,2, Shangang Jia5, Yanming Zhang3.
Abstract
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is closely related to gut microbiota, which may be significantly affected by ethnicity and the environment. Knowledge regarding the gut microbiome of Tibetan CHD patients living in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is very limited. In this study, we characterized the physiological parameters and gut microbiota from 23 healthy Tibetans (HT), 18 CHD patients, and 12 patients with non-stenosis coronary heart disease (NCHD). We analyzed the alterations of the gut microbiome in CHD patients and investigated the relationship between these alterations and the pathological indicators. We found no changes in trimethylamine N-oxide, however, a significant increase in lipopolysaccharides and white blood cells, and a decrease in high-density lipoprotein were observed in the blood of CHD patients, compared to that in the HT group. The gut microbiota of the NCHD group had a significantly higher Shannon index than that of the HT group. Adonis analysis showed that both microbial compositions and functions of the three groups were significantly separated. The Dialister genus was significantly lower and Blautia, Desulfovibrio, and Succinivibrio were significantly higher in abundance in CHD patients compared with the HT group, and the changes were significantly correlated with physiological indexes, such as increased lipopolysaccharides. Moreover, enrichment of genes decreased in four pathways of amino acid metabolism, such as arginine biosynthesis and histidine metabolism, although two lipid metabolism pathways, including fatty acid degradation and arachidonic acid metabolism, increased in the CHD group. Additionally, occupation and a family history of CHD were shown to be risk factors and affected the gut microbiota in Tibetans. Our study will provide insights into the understanding of CHD, leading to better diagnosis and treatment of Tibetan patients.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rDNA; Tibetan; coronary heart disease (CHD); gut microbiome; lipopolysaccharide (LPS); metagenome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32793515 PMCID: PMC7390946 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00373
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
General characteristics of the CHD, NCHD, and HT groups.
| Age (years) | 53.3 ± 6.7 | 53.0 ± 10.0 | 41.5 ± 9.6 |
| Sex (female/male) | 0/18 | 3/9 | 13/10 |
| Body Mass Index (kg/cm2) | 26.5 ± 5.4 | 27.6 ± 5.4 | 25.2 ± 3.7 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 120.94 ± 16.48 | 125.25 ± 20.65 | 108.56 ± 14.12 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 76.06 ± 12.61 | 84.75 ± 22.35 | 69.57 ± 10.55 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 78.89 ± 11.43 | 79.75 ± 20.94 | 67.78 ± 6.93 |
| Smoking (yes/no) | 8/10 | 4/8 | 5/18 |
| Alcohol (yes/no) | 2/16 | 3/9 | 2/21 |
| Family medical history (yes/no/unknown) | 9/6/3 | 4/3/5 | 9/7/7 |
| Occupation (herdsman/staff/unemployed) | 4/11/3 | 4/6/2 | 9/5/9 |
| Geographical locations(<3,500 m/≧3,500 m) | 12/6 | 7/5 | 14/9 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.17 ± 1.12 | 4.36 ± 0.57 | 4.54 ± 0.81 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.50 ± 0.92 | 1.60 ± 0.87 | 1.27 ± 0.58 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.03 ± 0.30 | 0.98 ± 0.12 | 1.18 ± 0.20 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.30 ± 1.11 | 3.46 ± 0.68 | 3.29 ± 0.91 |
| APO-A1 (g/L) | 0.95 ± 0.22 | 1.00 ± 0.15 | 1.16 ± 0.14 |
| APO-B (g/L) | 0.68 ± 0.22 | 0.74 ± 0.18 | 0.72 ± 0.20 |
| LP(a) (mg/L) | 339.33 ± 216.48 | 328.25 ± 243.58 | 235.82 ± 199.06 |
| BUN/Cr | 0.077 ± 0.021 | 0.080 ± 0.021 | 0.062 ± 0.018 |
| UA (μmol/L) | 367.33 ± 81.58 | 370.25 ± 82.95 | 291.50 ± 66.04 |
| GLU (mmol/L) | 5.49 ± 0.97 | 5.66 ± 1.64 | 4.76 ± 0.60 |
| Hcy (μmol/L) | 15.50 ± 6.61 | 11.18 ± 2.27 | 14.60 ± 8.81 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 32.29 ± 47.35 | 5.88 ± 2.38 | 4.86 ± 1.56 |
| WBC (109/L) | 9.96 ± 5.38 | 6.81 ± 1.50 | 6.04 ± 1.46 |
| RBC (1012/L) | 5.16 ± 0.78 | 5.29 ± 0.60 | 5.19 ± 0.45 |
| HGB (g/L) | 159.33 ± 21.22 | 155.67 ± 19.28 | 151.43 ± 21.48 |
| HCT (%) | 47.83 ± 5.64 | 47.08 ± 5.05 | 46.22 ± 5.62 |
| PLT (109/L) | 166.28 ± 47.38 | 195.92 ± 62.17 | 219.65 ± 62.33 |
| Choline (μmol/L) | 10.97 ± 2.94 | 12.33 ± 3.22 | 9.39 ± 2.14 |
| Betaine (μmol/L) | 62.15 ± 22.28 | 57.99 ± 19.05 | 47.48 ± 16.86 |
| TMAO (μmol/L) | 5.17 ± 6.23 | 7.69 ± 5.69 | 4.08 ± 4.65 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 95.10 ± 38.26 | 89.79 ± 19.83 | 75.27 ± 17.29 |
| L-carnitine (μmol/L) | 46.04 ± 9.10 | 45.58 ± 6.63 | 39.30 ± 10.00 |
| Plasma LPS (pg/ml) | 5.63 ± 0.72 | 4.12 ± 0.63 | 2.74 ± 0.67 |
| Fecal LPS (pg/g) | 38.05 ± 5.08 | 21.04 ± 6.29 | 10.68 ± 4.62 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD. All p-values are from the one-way ANOVA test or the Kruskal–Wallis test, except for sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, family history, profession, and geographical locations (χ2 tests).
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01, CHD vs. HT;
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01, NCHD vs. HT;
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01, CHD vs. NCHD.
Figure 1Physiological and microbial diversity in the three groups. (A) PCoA based on Bray–Curtis distances of the physiological indexes among the three groups in Table 1. (B) PCoA based on Bray–Curtis distances of the top 10 microbial phyla relative abundance among the three groups. (C) The number of observed operational taxonomic units. (D) Observed species. (E) Shannon curves for each group. (F) The Shannon index. (G) Chao1 curves for each group. (H) Simpson index Values are presented as mean ± SEM. Differences were calculated by one-way ANOVA and are denoted as: *p < 0.05.
Figure 2Taxonomic alterations in the three groups. Pairwise comparisons of CHD vs. HT (A), CHD vs. NCHD (B), and NCHD vs. HT (C) by the linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) method (LDA > 2, p < 0.05). Composition of gut bacterial communities at the phylum (D) and genus (E) levels. (F) Gut microbiota co-occurrence networks. Nodes represent operational taxonomic units, and the node sizes indicate different abundances. Links between the nodes represent significant Spearman correlations between the abundances of two operational taxonomic units; correlations >0.4 or lower than −0.4 were visualized. The color of the line reflects the direction (green: positive; red: negative).
Figure 3Functional variations of the gut microbiome between the three groups. (A) Boxplot of the KEGG orthology (KO) richness and KO Shannon diversity index. Differences were assessed by the Kruskal–Wallis test and are denoted as: **p < 0.01. (B) Dissimilarities in the level-3 functional profiles of gut microbiota among the three groups based on the Bray–Curtis distance derived from the relative abundance of genes using principal coordinate analysis. Level-2 and level-3 KEGG pathways were differentially represented between the CHD and HT (C) as well as NCHD and HT (D). Differences were assessed by the Welch t-test and are denoted as the corrected p-value.
Figure 4Heatmaps of Spearman's correlations. (A) Heatmap of correlations between altered physiological indices. (B) Heatmaps of correlations between altered microbial taxa and physiological indices. (C) Heatmap of correlations between altered microbial taxa and altered KEGG pathways. (D) Heatmap of correlations between physiological indexes and altered KEGG pathways.
Figure 5Correspondence analysis (CA) based on the lifestyle survey. (A) The first two dimensions of the CA and the amount of variation explained are shown. Each point represents an individual, and colors represent the groups. (B) Distribution of groups along the CA1 axis shows patterns of separation. Differences were assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis test and aredenoted as: **p < 0.01. (C) Factors in green (occupation and family medical history) are those that have greater Eigenvalues than expected and thus contribute the most to the top two dimensions in the CA.
Figure 6Effects of different occupations and family medical histories (FMHs) on gut microbiome. (A) Differences in bacterial relative abundance at the genus level among different occupations. (B) Bacterial relative abundance comparisons among the three groups and different careers at the genus level. (C) Differences in bacterial relative abundance at the genus level among people with and without a FMH of CHD. (D) Comparisons of bacterial relative abundance at the genus level among the three groups with/without a FMH of CHD. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. Differences were assessed by the Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal–Wallis tests and are denoted as follows: *corrected p < 0.05; **corrected p < 0.01.