Literature DB >> 32793205

Commentary: Long-term in vivo microscopy of CAR T cell dynamics during eradication of CNS lymphoma in mice.

Hocine Rachid Hocine1, Hue T Quach1, Prasad S Adusumilli1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAR T cells; CNS lymphoma; blood-brain barrier; regional administration; solid tumors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32793205      PMCID: PMC7385276          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), an aggressive extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma, accounts for 90% of cases of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Despite treatment with chemotherapy and immunotherapy, 1 in 3 patients with DLBCL either have refractory disease or experience relapse (1, 2). Anti-CD19 CAR T cells have elicited dramatic responses in hematological malignancies, but their efficacy against solid tumors and hematological malignancies with intracerebral tumors remains limited. The hurdles to achieving antitumor efficacy against solid tumors using CAR T cells—such as limited infiltration, limited penetration, and an immunosuppressive microenvironment—are also impediments to eradicating intracerebral tumors in PCNSL (3). In addition, the blood-brain barrier impedes intravenous CAR T-cell administration.

Novelty

The authors developed a mouse model of orthotopic, fluorescent-labeled PCNSL with intracerebral and periventricular tumor growth and created chronic cranial windows, which allowed longitudinal observation of tumor and T-cell kinetics (4). Three-dimensional quantification of intratumoral T cells by use of two-photon laser scanning microscopy (TPLSM) demonstrated that intravenously administered anti-CD19 CAR T cells accumulated in limited numbers at a late time point, at levels equal to mock CAR T cells, resulting in tumor regression in a fraction of treated mice. In contrast, intracerebrally administered anti-CD19 CAR T cells accumulated and penetrated deeply at higher numbers than mock CAR T cells. The most remarkable achievement of this study was its use of cranial windows and TPLS to observe intratumoral proliferation, CAR T-cell infiltration, and intracerebral CAR T-cell velocities at the tumor site without the need to sacrifice mice (Figure 1). It is likewise impressive that the study demonstrated that, although the non-activated CAR T-cell velocity in intracerebral tumors remained unchanged, antigen-activated anti-CD19 CAR T cells had reduced velocity, compared with mock CAR T cells. Reduced velocities suggest CAR T cells form an immunological synapse with tumor cells and that, after tumor eradication, intratumoral tumor-specific CAR T cells may resume higher velocities—observations that were associated with tumor regression. These observations were confirmed in mice without cranial windows, indicating that surgery-related inflammation did not influence results. The authors showed a difference in infiltration patterns. Whereas mock CAR T cells primarily accumulated at the tumor borders, h19m28z CAR T cells significantly outnumbered mock CAR T cells and infiltrated deeper tumor regions. Immunofluorescence analyses of harvested organs showed that anti-CD19 CAR T cells lacked CD27, a marker of differentiation from resting memory T cells to terminal effector T cells. In contrast, mock CAR T cells retained CD27. Even after tumor regression, intracerebral anti-CD19 CAR T cells were observed for 35 to 159 days. More importantly, following intracerebral injection, circulating anti-CD19 CAR T cells were observed in non-draining, distant inguinal lymph nodes at higher numbers than mock CAR T cells.
Figure 1

Schematic comparison of systemic and regionally delivered h19m28z CAR T cells in a PCNSL mouse model. Fourteen days after establishment of the cranial window, 2.5 ×106 U2932 tdt (red) cells were injected (diluted from 1 μL of PBS to 2 μL of PBS) orthotopically in homozygous male NMRI Foxn1nu/nu mice. Fourteen days after implementation of tumor cells, h19m28z CAR T cells (green) were administered either intravenously by injecting 3.5 ×105 cells (diluted from 100 μL of PBS to 200 μL of PBS) or intracerebrally by injecting 5 ×104 cells (diluted from 1 μL of PBS to 2 μL of PBS). (A) Intravenous administration resulted in a low presence (infiltration, accumulation, and depth) of h19m28z CAR T cells, without a sustained effect on tumor cells, in the majority of mice. (B) In contrast, after intracerebral injection, h19m28z CAR T cells were present at higher numbers and higher depth, compared with mock CAR T cells. h19m28z CAR T cells also had low velocity, compared with mock CAR T cells, owing to immune synapse formation and the killing of tumor cells, leading to reduced PCNSL growth and tumor regression. Moreover, compared with the mock CAR T cells, which persisted for <3 weeks, h19m28z CAR T cells were found to persist for up to 159 days (central panel) and migrated to non-draining lymph nodes (right panel). IC, intracerebral; IV, intravenous. This figure includes cropped figures from the article “Long-term in vivo microscopy of CAR T cell dynamics during eradication of CNS lymphoma in mice” by Mulazzani et al. (4), under Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0. Permission has been provided by authors of the original work to share modified material.

Schematic comparison of systemic and regionally delivered h19m28z CAR T cells in a PCNSL mouse model. Fourteen days after establishment of the cranial window, 2.5 ×106 U2932 tdt (red) cells were injected (diluted from 1 μL of PBS to 2 μL of PBS) orthotopically in homozygous male NMRI Foxn1nu/nu mice. Fourteen days after implementation of tumor cells, h19m28z CAR T cells (green) were administered either intravenously by injecting 3.5 ×105 cells (diluted from 100 μL of PBS to 200 μL of PBS) or intracerebrally by injecting 5 ×104 cells (diluted from 1 μL of PBS to 2 μL of PBS). (A) Intravenous administration resulted in a low presence (infiltration, accumulation, and depth) of h19m28z CAR T cells, without a sustained effect on tumor cells, in the majority of mice. (B) In contrast, after intracerebral injection, h19m28z CAR T cells were present at higher numbers and higher depth, compared with mock CAR T cells. h19m28z CAR T cells also had low velocity, compared with mock CAR T cells, owing to immune synapse formation and the killing of tumor cells, leading to reduced PCNSL growth and tumor regression. Moreover, compared with the mock CAR T cells, which persisted for <3 weeks, h19m28z CAR T cells were found to persist for up to 159 days (central panel) and migrated to non-draining lymph nodes (right panel). IC, intracerebral; IV, intravenous. This figure includes cropped figures from the article “Long-term in vivo microscopy of CAR T cell dynamics during eradication of CNS lymphoma in mice” by Mulazzani et al. (4), under Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0. Permission has been provided by authors of the original work to share modified material.

Discussion

The study provides a comprehensive in vivo analysis of the mechanisms of CAR T cells in a PCNSL model, but the results raise questions that require further study. First, the authors showed that, in mice treated with mock CAR T cells, but not in mice treated with h19m28z CAR T cells, CD3 T cells were in close association with CD11c myeloid cells, which formed a dense rim around the tumor. The effects of tumoral stroma and the tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment on CAR T-cell migration, proliferation, and egress are not clear. These important factors that limit antitumor efficacy should therefore be studied in a solid-tumor model. The information obtained may not only highlight the influence of organ-specific immune microenvironments on CAR T cells but also allow investigators to identify strategies to manipulate the tumor immune microenvironment to further improve the antitumor efficacy of CAR T cells in solid tumors. Second, the authors show that the dose of CD19 CAR T cells delivered intracerebrally (2 ×104 CAR T cells) was more effective than a 17.5-fold higher dose delivered intravenously (3.5 ×105 CAR T cells). We and others have shown that, following regional administration of CAR T cells, CD4 CAR T cells are antigen-activated and can provide better helper function to CD8 CAR T cells (5); this results in higher antitumor efficacy, compared with systemic administration. Further dissection of the individual and interdependent roles of CD4 and CD8, as well as those of CAR and non-CAR T cells, within the solid-tumor environment following regional administration is therefore warranted. Third, it is not clear whether the entry of anti-CD19 CAR T cells into non-draining lymph nodes was influenced by cancer cells or whether the altered chemokine receptor profile of antigen-activated anti-CD19 CAR T cells facilitated their entry. A better understanding of CAR T-cell entry into tumors and lymph nodes will greatly influence solid-tumor CAR T-cell therapy. Fourth, understanding CAR T-cell dynamics in heterogenous antigen expression (6), which is common in solid tumors, unlike CD19 expression in hematological malignancies, is important. Fifth, we and others have shown that exhausted CAR T cells can be rescued by anti-PD1 strategies (6); as such, visualization of CAR T-cell kinetics following administration of anti-PD1 agent is relevant to current clinical applications (7). The translational relevance of this study also raises questions for further investigation. Neurological toxicities, collectively referred to as CAR T cell-related encephalopathy syndrome, occur in approximately 12% to 32% of patients treated with CD19 CARs, highlighting the life-threatening risks of immune inflammatory reactions in the central nervous system (8, 9). Additionally, high-dose intravenous infusion (1 ×1010 T cells) increases the risk of serious pulmonary toxicities (10). Intracerebral delivery may reduce the risk of systemic toxicities and be more suitable for the treatment of PCNSL, a possibility that requires clinical investigation. Additionally, although understanding CAR T-cell dynamics within solid tumors and lymph nodes is important, it is highly desirable to correlate intratumoral and systemic CAR T-cell kinetics in a clinically relevant model, owing to limitations when obtaining serial biopsy specimens from patients. The findings presented by the authors merit commendation for providing a framework for future investigation into the treatment of PCNSL as well as solid tumors.

Author Contributions

HH, HQ, and PA wrote the draft. PA reviewed, corrected, and approved the final manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

PA has received research funding from ATARA Biotherapeutics and OSE Immunotherapies, has received research fees from ATARA Biotherapeutics, and has an issued patent 10,538,588 (mesothelin-targeted chimeric antigen receptor) licensed to ATARA Biotherapeutics, issued patent EP1979000B1 (method for detection of cancer cells using virus), and pending patent applications WO2018165228A1, CA3034691A1, CA3007980A1, AU2016316033A1 (PD-1 dominant negative receptor), US20170172477A1 (wireless pulse-oximetry device), and on an ex vivo malignant pleural effusion culture system. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  10 in total

1.  Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2.

Authors:  Richard A Morgan; James C Yang; Mio Kitano; Mark E Dudley; Carolyn M Laurencot; Steven A Rosenberg
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  Endothelial Activation and Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in Neurotoxicity after Adoptive Immunotherapy with CD19 CAR-T Cells.

Authors:  Juliane Gust; Kevin A Hay; Laïla-Aïcha Hanafi; Daniel Li; David Myerson; Luis F Gonzalez-Cuyar; Cecilia Yeung; W Conrad Liles; Mark Wurfel; Jose A Lopez; Junmei Chen; Dominic Chung; Susanna Harju-Baker; Tahsin Özpolat; Kathleen R Fink; Stanley R Riddell; David G Maloney; Cameron J Turtle
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 39.397

3.  Regional delivery of mesothelin-targeted CAR T cell therapy generates potent and long-lasting CD4-dependent tumor immunity.

Authors:  Prasad S Adusumilli; Leonid Cherkassky; Jonathan Villena-Vargas; Christos Colovos; Elliot Servais; Jason Plotkin; David R Jones; Michel Sadelain
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 4.  Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: optimizing outcome in the context of clinical and biologic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Laurie H Sehn; Randy D Gascoyne
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Human CAR T cells with cell-intrinsic PD-1 checkpoint blockade resist tumor-mediated inhibition.

Authors:  Leonid Cherkassky; Aurore Morello; Jonathan Villena-Vargas; Yang Feng; Dimiter S Dimitrov; David R Jones; Michel Sadelain; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 6.  Modern management of relapsed and refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma: A perspective on the current treatment landscape and patient selection for CAR T-cell therapy.

Authors:  Veronika Bachanova; Miguel-Angel Perales; Jeremy S Abramson
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 7.  Combination Immunotherapy with CAR T Cells and Checkpoint Blockade for the Treatment of Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Rachel Grosser; Leonid Cherkassky; Navin Chintala; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 8.  Solid Tumors Challenges and New Insights of CAR T Cell Engineering.

Authors:  Safa Tahmasebi; Reza Elahi; Abdolreza Esmaeilzadeh
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 9.  CAR T cells for brain tumors: Lessons learned and road ahead.

Authors:  David Akhavan; Darya Alizadeh; Dongrui Wang; Michael R Weist; Jennifer K Shepphird; Christine E Brown
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 12.988

10.  Long-term in vivo microscopy of CAR T cell dynamics during eradication of CNS lymphoma in mice.

Authors:  Matthias Mulazzani; Simon P Fräßle; Iven von Mücke-Heim; Sigrid Langer; Xiaolan Zhou; Hellen Ishikawa-Ankerhold; Justin Leube; Wenlong Zhang; Sarah Dötsch; Mortimer Svec; Martina Rudelius; Martin Dreyling; Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Andreas Straube; Veit R Buchholz; Dirk H Busch; Louisa von Baumgarten
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Imaging CAR T-cell kinetics in solid tumors: Translational implications.

Authors:  Matthew S Skovgard; Hocine R Hocine; Jasmeen K Saini; Maxim Moroz; Rebecca Y Bellis; Srijita Banerjee; Aurore Morello; Vladimir Ponomarev; Jonathan Villena-Vargas; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  Mol Ther Oncolytics       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 6.311

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.