| Literature DB >> 32793193 |
Conghui Liu1,2,3, Chuanyan Yang1,3,4, Mengqiang Wang2, Shuai Jiang2, Qilin Yi1,3,4, Weilin Wang2,3,4, Lingling Wang1,3,4, Linsheng Song1,3.
Abstract
Cluster of differentiation 63 (CD63), a four-transmembrane glycoprotein in the subfamily ofEntities:
Keywords: Crassostrea gigas; innate immune response; phagosomes recruitment; receptor; tetraspanin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32793193 PMCID: PMC7387653 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Primers used in this study.
| Oligo(dT)-adaptor | GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTACT17 |
| T7 | GTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGC |
| ATGGGGTGTCGGGGTACC | |
| AGTGAATGCGGTGGGTAAG | |
| AGTCACCAAGGCTGCACAGAAAG | |
| TCCGACGTATTTCTTTGCGATGT | |
| GCTGGAATGCTGTGGAGGA | |
| ACATCTGGCAGGTCTGGTAGT | |
| CGGGGTACCGGTGGAGTACGATGCCTTAG | |
| ATAAGAATGCGGCCGCAGTGAATGCGGTGGGTAAG |
Figure 1Phylogenetic analysis of CgCD63H. The homologs of CgCD63H from vertebrates (Mus musculus, Xenopus tropicalis, Danio rerio, Salmo salar, and Oplegnathus fasciatus) and invertebrates (Drosophila melanogaster, Tenebrio molitor, Locusta migratoria, Haliotis discus discus, Aplysia californica, Biomphalaria glabrata, Pomacea canaliculata, and Mizuhopecten yessoensis) were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (Supplementary Data 1). (A) The unrooted tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm using the Mega 6.06 program based on the multiple sequence alignment by ClustalW. The reliability of the branching was tested by bootstrap (1,000 replicates). Red arrow head indicated CgCD63H. (B) The conserved residues and motifs in large extracellular loop were analyzed based on the multiple sequence alignment.
Figure 2Tissue distribution of the CgCD63H transcripts. CgCD63H relative messenger RNA (mRNA) expression level in mantle, gonad, hemocytes, gills, labial palps, and hepatopancreas was normalized to that of CgEF1-α. Each value was shown as mean ± SE (N = 6), and bars with different letters were significantly different (p < 0.01).
Figure 3Temporal expression profile of CgCD63H messenger RNA (mRNA) post-V. splendidus challenge. Oyster hemocytes were employed to analyze CgCD63H expression, at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after V. splendidus challenge. Comparison of the level of CgCD63H mRNA (relative to CgEF1-α) was normalized to 0 h, which was indicated as “relative expression level of CgCD63H.” The values were shown as mean ± SE (n = 6), and bars with different letters were significantly different (p < 0.01).
Figure 4Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Western blot analysis of CgCD63H. Lane M, protein molecular standard; lane 1, negative control for CgCD63H (without induction); lane 2, induced rCgCD63H; lane 3, purified rCgCD63H; lane 4, Western blot using purified anti-CgCD63H based on the hemocytes lysate sample.
Figure 5Subcellular localization of CgCD63H protein in oyster hemocytes. Binding of antibody to CgCD63H was visualized by Alexa 488-labeled secondary antibody (green); the nucleus of hemocytes was stained with DAPI (blue), bar = 5 μm.
Figure 6ELISA analysis of the interaction between CgCD63H and the pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Plates were coated with LPS, PGN, GLU, and MAN, and then incubated with a series of concentrations of rCgCD63H and rTrx at the presence of lyophilized hemolymph at 18°C for 2 h. After incubated with anti-CgCD63H, the interaction was detected with goat antimouse Ig-alkaline phosphatase conjugate at 405 nm. Samples with P/N (Psample – Bblank/Nnegative – Bblank) > 2.1 were considered positive. Results are representative of the mean of three replicates ± SE.
Figure 7Specific recruitment of CgCD63H to the Y. lipolytica-containing phagosomes. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled Y. lipolytica was selected to investigate the phagosome recruitment; the cell membrane and nucleus of Y. lipolytica were indicated with green signal. The hemocyte suspension was mixed with 20 μl of Y. lipolytica (OD600 = 0.6, suspended in Tris–HCl) and incubated in the dark for 1 h. Antibody anti-CgCD63H was employed to detect the endogenic CgCD63H. Binding of antibody to CgCD63H was visualized by DyLight 594-labeled secondary antibody (red); the nucleus of hemocytes was stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue), bar = 5 μm.
Figure 8Hemocyte phagocytosis rate post-incubation of anti-CgCD63H. Oyster hemocytes were employed to analyze the change in hemocytes' phagocytosis rate against S. aureus, V. splendidus, and Y. lipolytica post-incubation of anti-CgCD63H. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled microbe, anti-CgCD63H, and hemocytes were mixed and incubated for 1 h in dark. Recombinant protein rTRX and negative antibody were employed as negative controls. For each treatment, assay was performed in three different replicates for statistical analysis (p < 0.01).