| Literature DB >> 32793158 |
Noemi Procopio1, Stefano Ghignone2, Samuele Voyron2,3, Marco Chiapello2, Anna Williams4, Andrew Chamberlain5, Antonietta Mello2, Michael Buckley1,5.
Abstract
Decomposition of animal bodies in the burial environment plays a key role in the biochemistry of the soil, altering the balance of the local microbial populations present before the introduction of the carcass. Despite the growing number of studies on decomposition and soil bacterial populations, less is known on its effects on fungal communities. Shifts in the fungal populations at different post-mortem intervals (PMIs) could provide insights for PMI estimation and clarify the role that specific fungal taxa have at specific decomposition stages. In this study, we buried pig carcasses over a period of 1- to 6-months, and we sampled the soil in contact with each carcass at different PMIs. We performed metabarcoding analysis of the mycobiome targeting both the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 and 2, to elucidate which one was more suitable for this purpose. Our results showed a decrease in the fungal taxonomic richness associated with increasing PMIs, and the alteration of the soil fungal signature even after 6 months post-burial, showing the inability of soil communities to restore their original composition within this timeframe. The results highlighted taxonomic trends associated with specific PMIs, such as the increase of the Mortierellomycota after 4- and 6-months and of Ascomycota particularly after 2 months, and the decrease of Basidiomycota from the first to the last time point. We have found a limited number of taxa specifically associated with the carrion and not present in the control soil, showing that the major contributors to the recorded changes are originated from the soil and were not introduced by the carrion. As this is the first study conducted on burial graves, it sets the baseline for additional studies to investigate the role of fungal communities on prolonged decomposition periods and to identify fungal biomarkers to improve the accuracy of PMI prediction for forensic applications.Entities:
Keywords: forensic science; fungal communities; microbial ecology; necrobiome; next-generation sequencing; post-mortem interval; vertebrate decomposition
Year: 2020 PMID: 32793158 PMCID: PMC7393272 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1(A) Shannon alpha diversity measure of the samples collected after 1 (P1), 2 (P2), 4 (P3), and 6 (P4) months post-mortem for Library A (left) and Library B (right) and (B) box plot of the fungal richness of soil samples showing the raw number of OTUs per sample for Library A (top) and Library B (bottom), with standard deviations represented with vertical error bars and medians represented with a bold line in each box.
Post hoc Tukey test results for taxonomic richness calculated for Library A and B.
FIGURE 2(A) Boxplot showing Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of the replicates from the centroid for specific PMIs for Library A (top) and Library B (bottom) and (B) NMDS plot showing an increase in beta diversity between the control soil and the grave soil, represented by expanded ellipses for P1, P2, P3, and P4 (P1 = 1 month, P2 = 2 months, P3 = 4 months, and P4 = 6 months). Standard deviation is represented by the dimension of the ellipses. Library A is at the top of the figure, and Library B at the bottom. The homogeneity of dispersion among groups was supported by a non-significant result in permutest (p-value = 0.48 for Library A and 0.31 for Library B).
FIGURE 3Bar chart with abundances of taxa at a phylum level associated with control soil and with the experimental samples in Library A (top) and Library B (bottom). The order of the phyla represented in the legend is the same of the bars in the plot.
Families grouped according to their phylum showing statistical differences between the control and the various time points (P1 to P4).
| Library A | Library B | |||||||
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | |
| ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | |
| – | ↑ | – | – | – | ↑ | – | – | |
| – | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | – | – | – | – | |
| – | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | – | – | – | – | |
| – | ↓ | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | ↓ | ↓ | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | |
| – | – | – | – | – | ↓ | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | ↓ | – | ↓ | |
| ↑ | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | ↑ | – | – | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | ↓ | – | – | |
| – | – | – | – | – | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | |
| – | – | – | – | – | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | |
FIGURE 4Bar chart with abundances of the top 10 taxa at a family level associated with control soil and with the experimental samples in Library A (top) and Library B (bottom). The order of the families represented in the legend is the same of the bars in the plot.
FIGURE 5Mycobiome associated uniquely with the mammalian carcasses and not identified within the control sample at (A) family level and (B) genus level. Abundances per each family or genus were reported in different colors (see legend). The order of the families and genus represented in the legend is the same of the bars in the plot.