Literature DB >> 32792597

Activation of the RAS pathway through uncommon BRAF mutations in mucinous pancreatic cysts without KRAS mutation.

Rongqin Ren1,2, Somashekar G Krishna3, Wei Chen4, Wendy L Frankel4, Rulong Shen4, Weiqiang Zhao5,4, Matthew R Avenarius5,4, Jason Garee5, Sean Caruthers5, Dan Jones5,4,6.   

Abstract

Diagnostic testing of pancreatic cyst fluid obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has traditionally utilized elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (≥192 ng/ml) and cytomorphologic examination to differentiate premalignant mucinous from benign pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). Molecular testing for KRAS/GNAS mutations has been shown to improve accuracy of detecting mucinous PCLs. Using a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, we assess the status of PCL-associated mutations to improve understanding of the key diagnostic variables. Molecular analysis of cyst fluid was performed on 108 PCLs that had concurrent CEA and/or cytological analysis. A 48-gene NGS assay was utilized, which included genes commonly mutated in mucinous PCLs such as GNAS, KRAS, CDKN2A, and TP53. KRAS and/or GNAS mutations were seen in 59 of 68 (86.8%) cases with multimodality diagnosis of a mucinous PCL. Among 31 patients where surgical histopathology was available, the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of NGS for the diagnosis of mucinous PCL was 88.5%, 100%, and 90.3%, respectively. Cytology with mucinous/atypical findings were found in only 29 of 62 cases (46.8%), with fluid CEA elevated in 33 of 58 cases (56.9%). Multiple KRAS mutations at different variant allele frequencies were seen in seven cases favoring multiclonal patterns, with six of them showing at least two separate PCLs by imaging. Among the 6 of 10 cases with GNAS + /KRAS- results, uncommon, non-V600E exon 11/15 hotspot BRAF mutations were identified. The expected high degree of accuracy of NGS detection of KRAS and/or GNAS mutations for mucinous-PCLs, as compared with CEA and cytological examination, was demonstrated. Multiple KRAS mutations correlated with multifocal cysts demonstrated by radiology. In IPMNs that lacked KRAS mutations, the concurring BRAF mutations with GNAS mutations supports an alternate mechanism of activation in the Ras pathway.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32792597     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-00647-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  1 in total

1.  Integrated molecular pathology accurately determines the malignant potential of pancreatic cysts.

Authors:  Mohammad A Al-Haddad; Thomas Kowalski; Ali Siddiqui; Howard R Mertz; Damien Mallat; Nadim Haddad; Nidhi Malhotra; Brett Sadowski; Mark J Lybik; Sandeep N Patel; Emuejevoke Okoh; Laura Rosenkranz; Michael Karasik; Michael Golioto; Jeffrey Linder; Marc F Catalano
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 10.093

  1 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.

Authors:  Shiva Rangwani; Devarshi R Ardeshna; Brandon Rodgers; Jared Melnychuk; Ronald Turner; Stacey Culp; Wei-Lun Chao; Somashekar G Krishna
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  A nomogram for predicting survival in patients with advanced (stage III/IV) pancreatic body tail cancer: a SEER-based study.

Authors:  Huaqing Shi; Zhou Chen; Shi Dong; Ru He; Yan Du; Zishun Qin; Wence Zhou
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.847

3.  Simple mucinous cyst: another potential cancer precursor in the pancreas? Case report with molecular characterization and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Anna Caterina Milanetto; Alice Sabrina Tonello; Giovanni Valotto; Giada Munari; Claudio Luchini; Matteo Fassan; Claudio Pasquali
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Relevance of gene mutations and methylation to the growth of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms based on pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Go Asano; Katsuyuki Miyabe; Hiroyuki Kato; Michihiro Yoshida; Takeshi Sawada; Yasuyuki Okamoto; Hidenori Sahashi; Naoki Atsuta; Kenta Kachi; Akihisa Kato; Naruomi Jinno; Makoto Natsume; Yasuki Hori; Itaru Naitoh; Kazuki Hayashi; Yoichi Matsuo; Satoru Takahashi; Hiromu Suzuki; Hiromi Kataoka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Recent advances in the diagnostic evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions.

Authors:  Devarshi R Ardeshna; Troy Cao; Brandon Rodgers; Chidiebere Onongaya; Dan Jones; Wei Chen; Eugene J Koay; Somashekar G Krishna
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 5.374

Review 6.  Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms in Hereditary Cancer Syndromes.

Authors:  Devarshi R Ardeshna; Shiva Rangwani; Troy Cao; Timothy M Pawlik; Peter P Stanich; Somashekar G Krishna
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-22

Review 7.  Pancreatic Incidentaloma.

Authors:  Miłosz Caban; Ewa Małecka-Wojciesko
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 8.  Evaluating Pancreatic and Biliary Neoplasms with Small Biopsy-Based Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Doing More with Less.

Authors:  Ilias P Nikas; Giannis Mountzios; Guy I Sydney; Kalliopi J Ioakim; Jae-Kyung Won; Panagiotis Papageorgis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.