Literature DB >> 32792309

Prospective validation and comparison of new indexes for the assessment of coronary stenosis: resting full-cycle and quantitative flow ratio.

Carlos Cortés1, Fernando Rivero2, Enrique Gutiérrez-Ibañes3, Álvaro Aparisi4, José A San Román5, Ignacio J Amat-Santos5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 32792309     DOI： 10.1016/j.rec.2020.05.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)        ISSN： 1885-5857


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Agreement between Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (μQFR) and three-dimensional quantitative flow ratio (3D-QFR) in non-selected angiographic stenosis: A multicenter study.

Authors:  Carlos Cortés; Lili Liu; Scarlet Luisa Berdin; Pablo M Fernández-Corredoira; Ruiyan Zhang; Ulrich Schäfer; María López; José A Diarte; Shengxian Tu; Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.487

2.  Usefulness of the Hybrid RFR-FFR Approach: Results of a Prospective and Multicenter Analysis of Diagnostic Agreement between RFR and FFR-The RECOPA (REsting Full-Cycle Ratio Comparation versus Fractional Flow Reserve (A Prospective Validation)) Study.

Authors:  Juan Casanova-Sandoval; Diego Fernández-Rodríguez; Imanol Otaegui; Teresa Gil Jiménez; Marcos Rodríguez-Esteban; Kristian Rivera; Francisco Torres-Saura; Víctor Jiménez Díaz; Raymundo Ocaranza-Sánchez; Vicente Peral Disdier; Guillermo Sánchez-Elvira; Fernando Worner
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.279
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.