Literature DB >> 32792304

Salvage Therapy Outcomes in a Historical Cohort of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Farhad Ravandi1, Sherry Pierce2, Guillermo Garcia-Manero2, Tapan Kadia2, Elias Jabbour2, Gautam Borthakur2, Courtney D DiNardo2, Naval Daver2, Nicholas J Short2, Yesid Alvarado2, Jorge Cortes2, Christopher Kim3, Michael Kelsh3, Aaron Katz4, Richard Williams5, Zhao Yang3, Bhakti Mehta3, Hagop Kantarjian2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is poor, with no universal standard salvage therapy currently available for most patients. Novel therapies with efficacy in patient subsets often have limited activity in alternative subsets, resulting in a majority of patients not gaining benefit from these therapies. This study systematically evaluated patient outcomes in a large cohort of R/R AML patients from a single institution across all salvage therapy lines, up to and including the third line. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Outcomes of R/R AML patients treated at a single institution (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) between 2002 and 2016 were entered into a central database. Eligible patients received one or more lines of salvage therapy after first occurrence of R/R AML. Patients who received second- or third-line salvage treatment were also included in the first salvage analysis. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old at time of initial AML diagnosis, with no central nervous system involvement.
RESULTS: A total of 818 eligible patients received one or more lines of salvage therapy, 809 received second-line salvage therapy, and 397 received third-line salvage therapy. Complete remission rates decreased from 14% after first salvage therapy to 9% after second salvage therapy and 3% after third salvage therapy. Median overall survival was 6.30, 4.07, and 2.98 months after first, second, and third salvage therapies, respectively.
CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the best chance of obtaining long-term remission in AML is with a successful first induction. Strategies that improve initial response and decrease the likelihood of relapse should be pursued.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; Outcomes; Refractory; Relapse; Salvage therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32792304     DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk        ISSN: 2152-2669


  4 in total

1.  Phase II Trial of Pembrolizumab after High-Dose Cytarabine in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Jonathan S Serody; Ivana Gojo; Joshua F Zeidner; Benjamin G Vincent; Anastasia Ivanova; Dominic Moore; Karen P McKinnon; Alec D Wilkinson; Rupkatha Mukhopadhyay; Francesco Mazziotta; Hanna A Knaus; Matthew C Foster; Catherine C Coombs; Katarzyna Jamieson; Hendrik Van Deventer; Jonathan A Webster; Gabrielle T Prince; Amy E DeZern; B Douglas Smith; Mark J Levis; Nathan D Montgomery; Leo Luznik
Journal:  Blood Cancer Discov       Date:  2021-09-10

2.  Deciphering molecular mechanisms underlying chemoresistance in relapsed AML patients: towards precision medicine overcoming drug resistance.

Authors:  May Levin; Michal Stark; Yishai Ofran; Yehuda G Assaraf
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.722

3.  European LeukemiaNet-defined primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia: the value of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant and overall response.

Authors:  K H Begna; J Kittur; N Gangat; H Alkhateeb; M S Patnaik; A Al-Kali; M A Elliott; W J Hogan; M R Litzow; A Pardanani; C A Hanson; R P Ketterling; A Tefferi
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 11.037

4.  How We Incorporate Venetoclax in Treatment Regimens for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Abhishek Maiti; Marina Y Konopleva
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 3.360

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.