Literature DB >> 3279225

A comparison between ultrasound and gynecologic examination for detection of enlarged ovaries in a group of women at risk for ovarian carcinoma.

S Granberg1, M Wikland.   

Abstract

In order to evaluate the quality of ultrasound and gynecologic examination of the ovaries in women at risk for ovarian carcinoma, a group of 115 women all relatives to women with ovarian carcinoma, were examined. Although this small group of women was considered a risk group, no carcinoma was found. In premenopausal women 92% of the ovaries could be identified and measured using ultrasound. In postmenopausal women this figure was 87%, while only 30% could be identified at the gynecologic examination. This indicates that ultrasound examination of the ovaries is a much more reliable method for examining the ovary than gynecologic palpation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3279225     DOI: 10.7863/jum.1988.7.2.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  2 in total

1.  Mean ovarian diameter (MOD) as a predictor of poor ovarian response.

Authors:  Iavor K Vladimirov; Desislava M Tacheva; Krassimir B Kalinov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Ovarian cancer family and prophylactic choices.

Authors:  D G Evans; G Ribiero; D Warrell; D Donnai
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.318

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.