Joanne N Wood1, Devon Kratchman2, Philip V Scribano3, Steven Berkowitz4, Samantha Schilling5. 1. Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (JN Wood and PV Scribano), Philadelphia, Pa; PolicyLab, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (JN Wood and D Kratchman), Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania (JN Wood, PV Scribano, and S Berkowitz), Philadelphia, Pa. Electronic address: woodjo@email.chop.edu. 2. PolicyLab, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (JN Wood and D Kratchman), Philadelphia, Pa. 3. Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (JN Wood and PV Scribano), Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania (JN Wood, PV Scribano, and S Berkowitz), Philadelphia, Pa. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania (JN Wood, PV Scribano, and S Berkowitz), Philadelphia, Pa. 5. Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina (S Schilling), Chapel Hill, NC. Dr Berkowitz is now with Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prior single-site evaluations of Child Adult Relationship Enhancement in Primary Care (PriCARE), a 6-session group parent training, demonstrated reductions in child behavioral problems and improvements in positive parenting attitudes. OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of PriCARE on disruptive child behaviors, parenting stress, and parenting attitudes in a multisite study. METHODS: Caregivers of children 2- to 6-year-old with behavior concerns recruited from 4 pediatric primary care practices were randomized 2:1 to PriCARE intervention (n = 119) or waitlist control (n = 55). Seventy-nine percent of caregivers identified as Black and 59% had annual household incomes under $22,000. Child behavior, parenting stress, and parenting attitudes were measured at baseline and 2 to 3 months after intervention using the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory, Parenting Stress Index, and Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory-2. Marginal standardization implemented in a linear regression compared mean change scores from baseline to follow-up by treatment arm while accounting for clustering by site. RESULTS: Mean change scores from baseline to follow-up demonstrated greater improvements (decreases) in Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory problem scores but not intensity scores in the PriCARE arm compared to control, (problem: -4.4 [-7.5, -1.2] vs -1.8 [-4.1, 0.4], P= .004; intensity: -17.6 [-28.3, -6.9] vs -10.4 [-18.1, -2.6], P= .255). Decreases in parenting stress were greater in the PriCARE arm compared to control (-3.3 [-4.3, -2.3] vs 0 [-2.5, 2.5], P= .025). Parenting attitudes showed no significant changes (all P> .10). CONCLUSIONS: PriCARE showed promise in improving parental perceptions of the severity of child behaviors and decreasing parenting stress but did not have an observed impact on parenting attitudes.
BACKGROUND: Prior single-site evaluations of Child Adult Relationship Enhancement in Primary Care (PriCARE), a 6-session group parent training, demonstrated reductions in child behavioral problems and improvements in positive parenting attitudes. OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of PriCARE on disruptive child behaviors, parenting stress, and parenting attitudes in a multisite study. METHODS: Caregivers of children 2- to 6-year-old with behavior concerns recruited from 4 pediatric primary care practices were randomized 2:1 to PriCARE intervention (n = 119) or waitlist control (n = 55). Seventy-nine percent of caregivers identified as Black and 59% had annual household incomes under $22,000. Child behavior, parenting stress, and parenting attitudes were measured at baseline and 2 to 3 months after intervention using the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory, Parenting Stress Index, and Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory-2. Marginal standardization implemented in a linear regression compared mean change scores from baseline to follow-up by treatment arm while accounting for clustering by site. RESULTS: Mean change scores from baseline to follow-up demonstrated greater improvements (decreases) in Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory problem scores but not intensity scores in the PriCARE arm compared to control, (problem: -4.4 [-7.5, -1.2] vs -1.8 [-4.1, 0.4], P= .004; intensity: -17.6 [-28.3, -6.9] vs -10.4 [-18.1, -2.6], P= .255). Decreases in parenting stress were greater in the PriCARE arm compared to control (-3.3 [-4.3, -2.3] vs 0 [-2.5, 2.5], P= .025). Parenting attitudes showed no significant changes (all P> .10). CONCLUSIONS: PriCARE showed promise in improving parental perceptions of the severity of child behaviors and decreasing parenting stress but did not have an observed impact on parenting attitudes.
Authors: Samantha Schilling; Daniela Romero-Cely; Alexander Mebane; Krista M Perreira Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 2.988