Literature DB >> 32789681

Endoscopic versus Conventional Thyroid Surgery: A Comparison of Quality of Life, Cosmetic Outcomes and Overall Patient Satisfaction with Treatment.

Goonj Johri1, Gyan Chand2, Anjali Mishra2, Sabaretnam Mayilvaganan2, Gaurav Agarwal2, Amit Agarwal2, Saroj Kanta Mishra2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to investigate whether the surgical approach, i.e. endoscopic (ET) versus conventional/open thyroidectomy (ConT), contributes towards the improvement in quality of life (QoL), cosmetic outcomes and overall patient satisfaction with treatment.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective study (October 2016-August 2018) consisting of patients undergoing hemithyroidectomy for euthyroid, non-malignant solitary thyroid nodules (STNs). Patients were divided into two groups: Group I (ET)-41 patients and Group II (ConT)-52 patients. ET was performed via bilateral-axillo breast approach (BABA). A thyroid disease-specific questionnaire "ThyPRO-39hin" was used to evaluate pre- and post-operative QoL. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for post-operative pain. Cosmetic satisfaction, paraesthesia and overall satisfaction with treatment were evaluated using Likert-type verbal response scales. Pre- and post-operative scores (>6 months) were compared, and p value < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Mean age (p = 0.26), gender distribution (p = 0.07), mean tumour size (p = 0.74) and preoperative scores of QoL were comparable between the two groups. Post-operatively scores of symptom domain (p = 0.03), tiredness (p = 0.03), impaired social life (p = 0.03), cosmetic complaints (p =  < 0.001) and overall QoL (p =  < 0.001) were significantly better in Group I. Also, post-operative pain perception at first follow-up visit (p = 0.001) was lower in patients undergoing ET/Group I, with higher scar satisfaction scores (p =  < 0.001) and overall satisfaction with treatment (p =  < 0.001). Post-operative paraesthesia perception was comparable (p = 0.06) amongst the two groups.
CONCLUSION: In this cohort study, patients undergoing endoscopic thyroid surgery reported superior post-operative QoL, cosmetic and overall satisfaction with treatment as compared to conventional/open thyroidectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32789681     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05732-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  5 in total

1.  Authors' Reply: Endoscopic versus Conventional Thyroid Surgery: a Comparison of Quality of Life, Cosmetic Outcomes and Overall Patient Satisfaction with Treatment.

Authors:  Goonj Johri; Gyan Chand; Anjali Mishra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Letter to the Editor: Endoscopic Versus Conventional Thyroid Surgery: A Comparison of Quality of Life, Cosmetic Outcomes and Overall Patient Satisfaction with Treatment.

Authors:  Shijie Yang; Xiequn Xu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Complications of Trans-oral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ellada Akritidou; Gerasimos Douridas; Eleftherios Spartalis; Gerasimos Tsourouflis; Dimitrios Dimitroulis; Nikolaos I Nikiteas
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Gasless, endoscopic trans-axillary thyroid surgery: our series of the first 51 human cases.

Authors:  Rong Cong; Xinying Li; Hui Ouyang; Wenbo Xue; Zeyu Zhang; Fada Xia
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Drainage Tube Placement May Not Be Necessary During Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Bilateral Areola Approach: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Yukai Chen; Chengchen Wang; Binglong Bai; Mao Ye; Junjie Ma; Jingying Zhang; Zhiyu Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.