Literature DB >> 32789597

Emergence and transmission of misinformation in the context of social interactions.

Magda Saraiva1, Margarida Vaz Garrido2, Pedro B Albuquerque3.   

Abstract

The emergence and transmission of false memories is well documented in individual memory tasks. However, the examination of these processes in the context of social interaction still presents mixed findings. The present study further examines the potential of collaboration in minimizing the acceptance and retrieval of misinformation. In Experiment 1 participants watched a video immediately followed by a recall task (collaborative vs. nominal). Then a questionnaire (collaborative vs. individual) containing true information and misinformation about the video was presented. After the questionnaire, participants were given a new recall task (collaborative vs. nominal). We expected that collaboration at encoding and at retrieval would reduce the acceptance and recall of misinformation. Results revealed, as expected, that collaborative groups performed better in answering the questionnaire, accepting more correct information and rejecting more misinformation. Subsequently, they also recalled less misinformation. However, their recall of correct information was also lower. To rule out the potential role of collaborative inhibition in explaining the results observed in the final recall, in Experiment 2 the collaborative manipulation occurred only during the questionnaire and both recall tasks were individual. Again, participants answering the questionnaire collaboratively performed better than those answering individually. Critically, in a subsequent individual recall task, they produced less false memories and more correct information than those answering the questionnaire individually. These results suggest that collaboration during information encoding reduces the acceptance of misinformation and its subsequent recall.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collaborative inhibition; False memories; Misinformation; Social interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32789597     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01081-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  17 in total

1.  Consensus collaboration enhances group and individual recall accuracy.

Authors:  Celia B Harris; Amanda J Barnier; John Sutton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall: a gradual part-list cueing paradigm.

Authors:  Margarida V Garrido; Leonel Garcia-Marques; David L Hamilton
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2012

3.  Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.

Authors:  Helena M Blumen; Suparna Rajaram
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2008-04

4.  Social Transmission of False Memory in Small Groups and Large Networks.

Authors:  Raeya Maswood; Suparna Rajaram
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-05-21

Review 5.  A meta-analytic review of collaborative inhibition and postcollaborative memory: Testing the predictions of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis.

Authors:  Stéphanie B Marion; Craig Thorley
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  A comparison of group and individual remembering: does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?

Authors:  B H Basden; D R Basden; S Bryner; R L Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Acceptance and confidence of central and peripheral misinformation.

Authors:  Karlos Luna; Malen Migueles
Journal:  Span J Psychol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.264

9.  Expertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task.

Authors:  Michelle L Meade; Timothy J Nokes; Daniel G Morrow
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2008-12-22

10.  False memory ≠ false memory: DRM errors are unrelated to the misinformation effect.

Authors:  James Ost; Hartmut Blank; Joanna Davies; Georgina Jones; Katie Lambert; Kelly Salmon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.