Literature DB >> 32789223

Optimal Conditions for Obtaining Valid Step Count Measurements in Hospitalized Patients with Abnormal Gait.

Tomohiro Oba1, Hiroaki Iwase2, Yoshitake Oshima3, Junya Miyazaki2, Kojiro Ishii4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the optimum conditions for obtaining valid step-count measurements for patients with abnormal gait.
METHODS: Subjects comprised 61 hospitalized patients with abnormal gait. Four different devices were tested: Active Style Pro (AS), Walking Style (WS), Lifecorder PLUS, and Steps. The same device type was attached to the waist on both the affected and the unaffected side. Patients then walked 25 m at a comfortable speed. This test was repeated four times, once for each device. The measurement error (ME) and walking parameters (gait velocity, step length, and cadence) were calculated from the test data. ME scores smaller than 3% and 10% were classified as valid: scores above these standards were classified as invalid. Walking parameter values that identified the invalid group with a specificity of 0.95 were set as the cut-off velocity (COV), the cut-off step length (COS), and the cut-off cadence. Sensitivity values >0.40 and positive predictive values >80% were then set as necessary conditions.
RESULTS: COV values were 0.90 m/s (AS on the unaffected side at 3% ME and AS on the affected side or the unaffected side at 10% ME), 0.92 m/s (WS on the unaffected side at 10% ME), and 0.98 m/s (WS on the affected side at 3% ME). COS values were 0.50 m (AS on the affected side at 10% ME) and 0.52 m (AS on the unaffected side at 3% ME).
CONCLUSION: The most accurate measurements were obtained using AS attached to the unaffected side with a gait velocity of >0.90 m/s. ©2017 The Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activity monitor; gait disorder; pedometer; step count validity; walking parameter

Year:  2017        PMID: 32789223      PMCID: PMC7365229          DOI: 10.2490/prm.20170016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Rehabil Med        ISSN: 2432-1354


  21 in total

1.  Effects of walking speed and step frequency on estimation of physical activity using accelerometers.

Authors:  Jonghoon Park; Kazuko Ishikawa-Takata; Shigeho Tanaka; Yuko Mekata; Izumi Tabata
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.867

2.  Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost.

Authors:  Scott E Crouter; Patrick L Schneider; Murat Karabulut; David R Bassett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Systematic review of hip fracture rehabilitation practices in the elderly.

Authors:  Anna M Chudyk; Jeffrey W Jutai; Robert J Petrella; Mark Speechley
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults.

Authors:  Wojtek J Chodzko-Zajko; David N Proctor; Maria A Fiatarone Singh; Christopher T Minson; Claudio R Nigg; George J Salem; James S Skinner
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 5.  Interventions to improve real-world walking after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caroline M Stretton; Suzie Mudge; Nicola M Kayes; Kathryn M McPherson
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 3.477

Review 6.  Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of accelerometry-based measures.

Authors:  Nick Gebruers; Christel Vanroy; Steven Truijen; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Peter P De Deyn
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Prevalence and outcomes of low mobility in hospitalized older patients.

Authors:  Cynthia J Brown; Rebecca J Friedkin; Sharon K Inouye
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Reducing Sitting Time After Stroke: A Phase II Safety and Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Coralie English; Genevieve N Healy; Tim Olds; Gaynor Parfitt; Erika Borkoles; Alison Coates; Sharon Kramer; Julie Bernhardt
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 9.  How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Cora L Craig; Yukitoshi Aoyagi; Rhonda C Bell; Karen A Croteau; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Ben Ewald; Andrew W Gardner; Yoshiro Hatano; Lesley D Lutes; Sandra M Matsudo; Farah A Ramirez-Marrero; Laura Q Rogers; David A Rowe; Michael D Schmidt; Mark A Tully; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  A gait abnormality measure based on root mean square of trunk acceleration.

Authors:  Masaki Sekine; Toshiyo Tamura; Masaki Yoshida; Yuki Suda; Yuichi Kimura; Hiroaki Miyoshi; Yoshifumi Kijima; Yuji Higashi; Toshiro Fujimoto
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.