Literature DB >> 32788929

Validation of PROMIS Global-10 compared with legacy instruments in patients with shoulder instability.

Robert J Suriani1, Hafiz F Kassam1, Natalie R Passarelli1, Rachel Esparza1, David Kovacevic1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes instruments are used to measure patients' subjective assessment of health status. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 was developed to be a concise yet comprehensive instrument that provides physical and mental health scores and an estimated EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score.
METHODS: A total of 175 prospectively enrolled patients with shoulder instability completed the PROMIS Global-10, EQ-5D, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. Spearman correlations between PROMIS scores and the legacy instruments were calculated. Bland-Altman analysis assessed agreement between estimated and actual EQ-5D scores. Floor and ceiling effects were recorded.
RESULTS: Correlation between actual and estimated EQ-5D was excellent-good (0.64/p < 0.0005), but Bland-Altman agreement revealed high variability for estimated EQ-5D scores (95% CI: -0.30 to +0.34). Correlation of PROMIS physical scores was excellent-good with ASES (0.69/p < 0.0005), good with SANE (0.43/p<0.0005), and poor with WOSI (0.17/p = 0.13). Correlation between PROMIS mental scores and all legacy instruments was poor.
CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS Global-10 physical function scores show high correlation with ASES but poor correlation with other legacy instruments, suggesting it is an unreliable outcomes instrument in populations with shoulder instability. The PROMIS Global-10 cannot replace actual EQ-5D scores for cost-effectiveness assessment in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, study of diagnostic test.
© 2019 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASES; EQ-5D; PROMIS Global-10; SANE; WOSI; patient-reported outcome measures; performance; shoulder instability; validation

Year:  2019        PMID: 32788929      PMCID: PMC7400719          DOI: 10.1177/1758573219843617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  26 in total

1.  Orthopaedic information mastery: applying evidence-based information tools to improve patient outcomes while saving orthopaedists' time.

Authors:  S R Hurwitz; D Slawson; A Shaughnessy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Lower extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Matthew V Smith; Sandra E Klein; John C Clohisy; Geneva R Baca; Robert H Brophy; Rick W Wright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate.

Authors:  Christopher Jepson; David A Asch; John C Hershey; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Performance of PROMIS Instruments in Patients With Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Chris A Anthony; Natalie A Glass; Kyle Hancock; Matt Bollier; Brian R Wolf; Carolyn M Hettrich
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.

Authors:  G J King; R R Richards; J D Zuckerman; R Blasier; C Dillman; R J Friedman; G M Gartsman; J P Iannotti; J P Murnahan; V C Mow; S L Woo
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?

Authors:  C A McHorney; A R Tarlov
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare.

Authors:  Nick Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-28

9.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years.

Authors:  David Cella; Susan Yount; Nan Rothrock; Richard Gershon; Karon Cook; Bryce Reeve; Deborah Ader; James F Fries; Bonnie Bruce; Mattias Rose
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Dennis A Revicki; Karen L Spritzer; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of patient resilience on early recovery from rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Charlie D Wilson; Benjamin D Welling; Kendall Ap Hammonds; Brett N Robin
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2021-03-29

2.  Editorial Commentary: Delivering the PROMIS for Patients With Shoulder Disorders-Fool's Gold, a Mirage, or an Oasis.

Authors:  David Kovacevic
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 4.772

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.