Literature DB >> 32788388

eCLIPs bifurcation remodeling system for treatment of wide neck bifurcation aneurysms with extremely low dome-to-neck and aspect ratios: a multicenter experience.

Joost De Vries1, Hieronymus D Boogaarts1, Leif Sørensen2, Markus Holtmannspoetter3, Goetz Benndorf4,5, Bernd Turowski6, Georg Bohner7, Shahram Derakhshani8, Chema Navasa9, Wim H van Zwam10, Michael Söderman11,12, Riitta Rautio13, Christian Mathys14, Howard Riina15, Thomas R Marotta16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wide necked bifurcation aneurysms (WNBA) are among the most difficult aneurysms to treat. Very low dome-to-neck (DTN) and aspect ratios provide an even greater challenge in the management of WNBAs. We present the safety and efficacy profile for endovascular clip system (eCLIPs) device in the treatment of this subset of WNBAs with very unfavorable morphologies.
METHODS: In our case series, 24 patients treated at 12 international centers were taken from a larger prospective voluntary post-marketing registry of 65 patients treated with the eCLIPs device and coiling. Those who had WNBAs at either the carotid or basilar terminus with a DTN ratio <1.6 and aspect ratio <1.2 were included. Radiologic and clinical outcomes were assessed immediately after the procedure and at the latest follow-up.
RESULTS: The eCLIPs device was successfully deployed in 23 cases (96%). One patient (4.2%) died due to guidewire perforation distal to the implant site. No other complications were documented. After a mean follow-up of 15.8 months (range 3-40 months), good radiologic outcomes (modified Raymond-Roy classification (MRRC) scores of 1 or 2) were documented in 20 of 21 patients (95%) with follow-up data. The lone patient with an MRRC score of 3 showed coiled compaction after incomplete neck coverage with the device.
CONCLUSION: Our series of patients with aneurysms having adverse DTN and aspect ratios demonstrated that the eCLIPs device has a safety and efficacy profile comparable with currently available devices in the treatment of WNBAs. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneurysm; device

Year:  2020        PMID: 32788388     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  4 in total

1.  pCONUS 2 and pCONUS 2-HPC for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: Periprocedural, 6-month, and early 2-year follow-up outcomes.

Authors:  J Yeomans; A Sastry
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Intrasaccular flow disruption (WEB) of a large wide-necked basilar apex aneurysm using PulseRider-assistance.

Authors:  Kazim H Narsinh; M Travis Caton; Nausheen F Mahmood; Randall T Higashida; Van V Halbach; Steven W Hetts; Matthew R Amans; Christopher F Dowd; Daniel L Cooke
Journal:  Interdiscip Neurosurg       Date:  2020-12-29

3.  Propensity score-adjusted analysis on stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone for ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Lukas Goertz; Thomas Liebig; Lenhard Pennig; Marco Timmer; Hanna Styczen; Jan-Peter Grunz; Thorsten Lichtenstein; Marc Schlamann; Christoph Kabbasch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Results of the pToWin Study: Using the pCONUS Device for the Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Marta Aguilar Pérez; Hans Henkes; Wiebke Kurre; Carlos Bleise; Pedro Nicolás Lylyk; Javier Lundquist; Francis Turjman; Hanan Alhazmi; Christian Loehr; Stephan Felber; Hannes Deutschmann; Stephan Lowens; Luigi Delehaye; Markus Möhlenbruch; Jörg Hattingen; Pedro Lylyk
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.